linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] ARM: modify pgd_t definition for TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:39:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160203163946.GA20360@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1773775.QWf7OyDGPh@wuerfel>

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:21:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I ran into build errors on ARM after Willy's newly added generic
> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD support. We don't support this feature
> on ARM at all, but the patch causes a build error anyway:
> 
> In file included from ../kernel/memremap.c:17:0:
> ../include/linux/pfn_t.h:108:7: error: 'pud_mkdevmap' declared as function returning an array
>  pud_t pud_mkdevmap(pud_t pud);
> 
> We don't use a PUD on ARM, so pud_t is defined as pmd_t, which
> in turn is defined as
> 
> typedef unsigned long pgd_t[2];
> 
> on NOMMU and on 2-level MMU configurations. There is an (unused)
> other definition using a struct around the array, which happens to
> work fine here.
> 
> There is a comment in the file about the fact the other version
> is "easier on the compiler", and I've traced that version back
> to linux-2.1.80 when ARM support was first merged back in 1998.
> 
> It's probably a safe assumption that this is no longer necessary:
> The same logic existed in asm-i386 at the time but was removed
> a year later in 2.3.23pre3. The STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS logic
> also ended up getting copied into these files:
> 
> arch/alpha/include/asm/page.h
> arch/arc/include/asm/page.h
> arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-types.h
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
> arch/ia64/include/asm/page.h
> arch/parisc/include/asm/page.h
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
> arch/sparc/include/asm/page_32.h
> arch/sparc/include/asm/page_64.h

For the sparc32 case we use the simpler variants.
According to the comment this is due to limitation in
the way we pass arguments in the sparc32 ABI.
But I have not tried to compare a kernel for sparc32 with
and without the use of structs.

For sparc64 we use the stricter types (structs).
I did not check other architectures - but just wanted to
tell that the right choice may be architecture dependent.

	Sam

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-03 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03 13:21 Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-03 16:39 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2016-02-03 20:36   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160203163946.GA20360@ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox