From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f41.google.com (mail-qg0-f41.google.com [209.85.192.41]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951FF82963 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:43:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b35so27925818qge.0 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:43:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a7si7549224qhd.24.2016.02.03.14.43.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:43:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:43:16 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] thp: rewrite freeze_page()/unfreeze_page() with generic rmap walkers Message-Id: <20160203144316.f01573516f186071bb2cf1bf@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <56B21FC9.9040009@intel.com> References: <1454512459-94334-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <1454512459-94334-5-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <56B21FC9.9040009@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Hansen Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrea Arcangeli , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Christoph Lameter , Naoya Horiguchi , Steve Capper , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Jerome Marchand , Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:42:01 -0800 Dave Hansen wrote: > On 02/03/2016 07:14 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > But the new variant is somewhat slower. Current helpers iterates over > > VMAs the compound page is mapped to, and then over ptes within this VMA. > > New helpers iterates over small page, then over VMA the small page > > mapped to, and only then find relevant pte. > > The code simplification here is really attractive. Can you quantify > what the slowdown is? Is it noticeable, or would it be in the noise > during all the other stuff that happens under memory pressure? yup. And the "more testing is required" is a bit worrisome. Is this code really ready for getting pounded upon in -next? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org