From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/mm: If INVPCID is available, use it to flush global mappings
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:26:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160129142625.GH10187@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3e4f31df42ea5d5e190a6d1e300e01d55e09d79.1453746505.git.luto@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:37:44AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On my Skylake laptop, INVPCID function 2 (flush absolutely
> everything) takes about 376ns, whereas saving flags, twiddling
> CR4.PGE to flush global mappings, and restoring flags takes about
> 539ns.
FWIW, I ran your microbenchmark on the IVB laptop I have here 3 times
and some of the numbers from each run are pretty unstable. Not that it
means a whole lot - the thing doesn't have INVPCID support.
I'm just questioning the microbenchmark and whether we should be rather
doing those measurements with a real benchmark, whatever that means. My
limited experience says that measuring TLB performance is hard.
./context_switch_latency 0 thread same
use_xstate = 0
Using threads
1: 100000 iters at 2676.2 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 2700.2 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 2656.1 ns/switch
./context_switch_latency 0 thread different
use_xstate = 0
Using threads
1: 100000 iters at 5174.8 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 5140.5 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 5292.9 ns/switch
./context_switch_latency 0 process same
use_xstate = 0
Using a subprocess
1: 100000 iters at 2361.2 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 2332.2 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 3436.9 ns/switch
./context_switch_latency 0 process different
use_xstate = 0
Using a subprocess
1: 100000 iters at 4713.6 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 4957.5 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 5012.2 ns/switch
./context_switch_latency 1 thread same
use_xstate = 1
Using threads
1: 100000 iters at 2505.6 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 2483.1 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 2479.7 ns/switch
./context_switch_latency 1 thread different
use_xstate = 1
Using threads
1: 100000 iters at 5245.9 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 5241.1 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 5220.3 ns/switch
./context_switch_latency 1 process same
use_xstate = 1
Using a subprocess
1: 100000 iters at 2329.8 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 2350.2 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 2500.9 ns/switch
./context_switch_latency 1 process different
use_xstate = 1
Using a subprocess
1: 100000 iters at 4970.7 ns/switch
2: 100000 iters at 5034.0 ns/switch
3: 100000 iters at 4991.6 ns/switch
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-29 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 18:37 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/mm: INVPCID support Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-25 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mm: Add INVPCID helpers Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-29 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-25 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/mm: Add a noinvpcid option to turn off INVPCID Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-29 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-25 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/mm: If INVPCID is available, use it to flush global mappings Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-29 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-01-29 17:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-29 18:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-25 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/mm: INVPCID support Ingo Molnar
2016-01-27 10:09 ` several messages Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-29 13:21 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160129142625.GH10187@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox