From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHV2 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:11:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215131135.GE25973@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23b2515da9d06b198044ad83ca0a15ba38c24e6e.1449861203.git.tony.luck@intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:21:50PM -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> Using __copy_user_nocache() as inspiration create a memory copy
> routine for use by kernel code with annotations to allow for
> recovery from machine checks.
>
> Notes:
> 1) Unlike the original we make no attempt to copy all the bytes
> up to the faulting address. The original achieves that by
> re-executing the failing part as a byte-by-byte copy,
> which will take another page fault. We don't want to have
> a second machine check!
> 2) Likewise the return value for the original indicates exactly
> how many bytes were not copied. Instead we provide the physical
> address of the fault (thanks to help from do_machine_check()
> 3) Provide helpful macros to decode the return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 5 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c | 2 +
> arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
...
> + * mcsafe_memcpy - Uncached memory copy with machine check exception handling
> + * Note that we only catch machine checks when reading the source addresses.
> + * Writes to target are posted and don't generate machine checks.
> + * This will force destination/source out of cache for more performance.
... and the non-temporal version is the optimal one even though we're
defaulting to copy_user_enhanced_fast_string for memcpy on modern Intel
CPUs...?
Btw, it should be also inside an ifdef if we're going to ifdef
CONFIG_MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY everywhere else.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-11 19:13 [PATCHV2 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-12-10 21:58 ` [PATCHV2 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check fixup tables Tony Luck
2015-12-11 20:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 21:01 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-12 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 17:58 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-14 22:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 1:00 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-15 9:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 10:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-11 0:14 ` [PATCHV2 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Tony Luck
2015-12-11 20:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-15 11:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 23:46 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 0:21 ` [PATCHV2 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks Tony Luck
2015-12-11 20:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 21:19 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 21:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-12-11 21:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 22:17 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 22:20 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-11 22:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 22:35 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 22:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-11 22:45 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-11 22:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-14 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-14 19:46 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-14 20:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-15 13:11 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-12-15 17:45 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-15 17:53 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-15 18:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 18:27 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-15 18:35 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-15 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 19:19 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2015-12-15 19:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15 20:25 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2015-12-21 17:33 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215131135.GE25973@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox