From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152666B0038 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:57:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n186so4758562wmn.1 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk. [2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j84si1050597wma.50.2015.12.10.13.57.13 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:57:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:56:48 +0000 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing Message-ID: <20151210215648.GG20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20151209225148.GA14794@www.outflux.net> <20151210070635.GC31922@1wt.eu> <20151210181611.GB32083@1wt.eu> <20151210193351.GE20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20151210202749.GF20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Kees Cook Cc: Willy Tarreau , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , yalin wang , "Eric W. Biederman" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-MM , LKML On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:45:09PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > but generally you need ->f_lock. And in situations where the bit can > > go only off->on, check it lockless, skip the whole thing entirely if it's > > already set and grab the spinlock otherwise. > > And I can take f_lock safely under mmap_sem? Are you asking whether it's safe to take a spinlock under an rwsem? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org