From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9C36B0038 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:05:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so78620845wmv.1 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:05:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com. [74.125.82.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14si11688642wmq.78.2015.11.27.09.05.24 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:05:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so78620269wmv.1 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:05:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:05:22 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Allow GFP_IOFS for page_cache_read page cache allocation Message-ID: <20151127170522.GL2493@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1447251233-14449-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20151112095301.GA25265@quack.suse.cz> <20151126150820.GI7953@dhcp22.suse.cz> <56588789.1010300@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56588789.1010300@suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Jan Kara , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Tetsuo Handa , Mel Gorman , Dave Chinner , Mark Fasheh , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri 27-11-15 17:40:41, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 11/26/2015 04:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Thu 12-11-15 10:53:01, Jan Kara wrote: > >>On Wed 11-11-15 15:13:53, mhocko@kernel.org wrote: > >>> > >>>Hi, > >>>this has been posted previously as a part of larger GFP_NOFS related > >>>patch set (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438768284-30927-1-git-send-email-mhocko%40kernel.org) > >>>but I think it makes sense to discuss it even out of that scope. > >>> > >>>I would like to hear FS and other MM people about the proposed interface. > >>>Using mapping_gfp_mask blindly doesn't sound good to me and vm_fault > >>>looks like a proper channel to communicate between MM and FS layers. > >>> > >>>Comments? Are there any better ideas? > >> > >>Makes sense to me and the filesystems I know should be fine with this > >>(famous last words ;). Feel free to add: > >> > >>Acked-by: Jan Kara > > > >Thanks a lot! Are there any objections from other fs/mm people? > > Please replace "GFP_IOFS" in the subject, as the "flag" has been removed > recently. Otherwise Done. mm: Allow GFP_{FS,IO} for page_cache_read page cache allocation > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Thanks -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org