linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: hugepage compaction causes performance drop
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:45:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124024547.GA2529@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564EF0B6.10508@suse.cz>

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:06:46AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 10:33 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >On 11/20/2015 04:55 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >>On 11/19/2015 09:29 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>>+CC Andrea, David, Joonsoo
> >>>
> >>>On 11/19/2015 10:29 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >>>>The vmstat and perf-profile are also attached, please let me know if you
> >>>>need any more information, thanks.
> >>>
> >>>Output from vmstat (the tool) isn't much useful here, a periodic "cat
> >>>/proc/vmstat" would be much better.
> >>
> >>No problem.
> >>
> >>>The perf profiles are somewhat weirdly sorted by children cost (?), but
> >>>I noticed a very high cost (46%) in pageblock_pfn_to_page(). This could
> >>>be due to a very large but sparsely populated zone. Could you provide
> >>>/proc/zoneinfo?
> >>
> >>Is a one time /proc/zoneinfo enough or also a periodic one?
> >
> >Please see attached, note that this is a new run so the perf profile is
> >a little different.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Aaron
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> DMA32 is a bit sparse:
> 
> Node 0, zone    DMA32
>   pages free     62829
>         min      327
>         low      408
>         high     490
>         scanned  0
>         spanned  1044480
>         present  495951
>         managed  479559
> 
> Since the other zones are much larger, probably this is not the
> culprit. But tracepoints should tell us more. I have a theory that
> updating free scanner's cached pfn doesn't happen if it aborts due
> to need_resched() during isolate_freepages(), before hitting a valid
> pageblock, if the zone has a large hole in it. But zoneinfo doesn't

Today, I revisit this issue and yes, I think that your theory is
right. isolate_freepages() will not update cached pfn until call
isolate_freepages_block(). So, if there are many holes or many
unmovable pageblocks or !isolation_suitable() pageblocks, cached pfn
will not updated if compaction aborts due to need_resched(). zoneinfo
shows that there is not much holes so I guess that this problem is caused
by latter two cases.

It is better to update cached pfn in these cases. Although I don't see
your solution yet, I guess it will help here.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-24  2:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-19  9:29 Aaron Lu
2015-11-19 13:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-11-20  8:55   ` Aaron Lu
2015-11-20  9:33     ` Aaron Lu
2015-11-20 10:06       ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-11-23  8:16         ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-23  8:33           ` Aaron Lu
2015-11-23  9:24             ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-24  3:40               ` Aaron Lu
2015-11-24  4:55                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-24  7:27                   ` Aaron Lu
2015-11-24  8:29                     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-25 12:44                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-11-26  5:47                         ` Aaron Lu
2015-11-24  2:45         ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151124024547.GA2529@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox