From: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: allow gmap code to retry on faulting in guest memory
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:50:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151119115027.620143d4@BR9TG4T3.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564D8774.8090206@de.ibm.com>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:25:24 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 09:18 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:49:58 +0100
> > Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The userfaultfd does need FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY to not return
> >> VM_FAULT_SIGBUS. So we improve the gmap code to handle one
> >> VM_FAULT_RETRY.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
> >> index 54ef3bc..8a0025d 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
> >> @@ -577,15 +577,22 @@ int gmap_fault(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr,
> >> unsigned int fault_flags)
> >> {
> >> unsigned long vmaddr;
> >> - int rc;
> >> + int rc, fault;
> >>
> >> + fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY;
> >> +retry:
> >> down_read(&gmap->mm->mmap_sem);
> >> vmaddr = __gmap_translate(gmap, gaddr);
> >> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(vmaddr)) {
> >> rc = vmaddr;
> >> goto out_up;
> >> }
> >> - if (fixup_user_fault(current, gmap->mm, vmaddr, fault_flags)) {
> >> + fault = fixup_user_fault(current, gmap->mm, vmaddr, fault_flags);
> >> + if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) {
> >> + fault_flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY;
> >> + fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_TRIED;
> >> + goto retry;
> >> + } else if (fault) {
> >> rc = -EFAULT;
> >> goto out_up;
> >> }
> >
> > Me thinks that you want to add the retry code into fixup_user_fault itself.
> > You basically have the same code around the three calls to fixup_user_fault.
> > Yes, it will be a common code patch but I guess that it will be acceptable
> > given userfaultfd as a reason.
>
> That makes a lot of sense. In an earlier discussion (a followup of Jasons
> mm: Loosen MADV_NOHUGEPAGE to enable Qemu postcopy on s390) patch.
>
> Andrea suggested the following:
>
> It's probably better to add a fixup_user_fault_unlocked that will work
> like get_user_pages_unlocked. I.e. leaves the details of the mmap_sem
> locking internally to the function, and will handle VM_FAULT_RETRY
> automatically by re-taking the mmap_sem and repeating the
> fixup_user_fault after updating the FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY to
> FAULT_FLAG_TRIED.
I know, I saw his mail. But within the gmap code we need to take the mmap_sem before calling fixup_user_fault as well as holding it for later on like __gmap_link.
We could introduce a new wrapper arround fixup_user_fault, like:
fixup_user_fault_retry, which would take care of the retry logic, but does not encapsulate the complete mmap_sem logic.
@Kirill would that be acceptable for you as well?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 23:49 [PATCH 0/2] Allow gmap fault to retry Dominik Dingel
2015-11-18 23:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: fixup_userfault returns VM_FAULT_RETRY if asked Dominik Dingel
2015-11-19 0:14 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-11-18 23:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: allow gmap code to retry on faulting in guest memory Dominik Dingel
2015-11-19 8:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-11-19 8:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 10:50 ` Dominik Dingel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151119115027.620143d4@BR9TG4T3.de.ibm.com \
--to=dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=emunson@akamai.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox