From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
matt.fleming@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, leif.lindholm@linaro.org,
roy.franz@linaro.org, msalter@redhat.com, ryan.harkin@linaro.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] ARM: only consider memblocks with NOMAP cleared for linear mapping
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:00:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151116190003.GG8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447698757-8762-11-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:32:35PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Take the new memblock attribute MEMBLOCK_NOMAP into account when
> deciding whether a certain region is or should be covered by the
> kernel direct mapping.
It's probably worth looking at this as a replacement to the way
arm_memblock_steal() works, provided NOMAP doesn't result in the
memory being passed to the kernel allocators. Thoughts?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-16 18:32 [PATCH v2 00/12] UEFI boot and runtime services support for 32-bit ARM Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] mm/memblock: add MEMBLOCK_NOMAP attribute to memblock memory table Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 19:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 19:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 20:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] arm64: only consider memblocks with NOMAP cleared for linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] arm64/efi: mark UEFI reserved regions as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] arm64/efi: split off EFI init and runtime code for reuse by 32-bit ARM Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-17 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-19 22:34 ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-20 6:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] arm64/efi: refactor " Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-17 9:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] ARM: add support for generic early_ioremap/early_memremap Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] ARM: split off core mapping logic from create_mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 19:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 19:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] ARM: factor out allocation routine from __create_mapping() Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] ARM: implement create_mapping_late() for EFI use Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ARM: only consider memblocks with NOMAP cleared for linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 19:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-11-16 19:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ARM: wire up UEFI init and runtime support Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 19:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-16 19:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 19:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-17 5:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] ARM: add UEFI stub support Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-16 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] UEFI boot and runtime services support for 32-bit ARM Ryan Harkin
2015-11-17 9:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151116190003.GG8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=roy.franz@linaro.org \
--cc=ryan.harkin@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox