linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:30:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151110083042.GS31308@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1511091603240.26497@east.gentwo.org>

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:04:51PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> 
> > I think it must be &object
> >
> > BTW why is object defined as void **? I suspect we can safely drop one
> > star.
> 
> See get_freepointer()
> 
> static inline void *get_freepointer(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> {
>         return *(void **)(object + s->offset);
> }

In this function object has type (void *)

> 
> The object at some point has a freepointer and ** allows the use of the
> s->offset field to get to it.

But it doesn't mean we have to define it as (void **) in
slab_alloc_node. Actually, the fact that object is of type (void **) is
never used in slab_alloc_node, and all functions called by it accept
(void *) for object, not (void **). Dropping one star there doesn't
break anything and looks less confusing IMO.

Thanks,
Vladimir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-05 15:37 [PATCH V2 0/2] SLUB bulk API interactions with kmem cgroup Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 15:37 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 16:18   ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 16:40     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 15:38 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] slub: add missing kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 16:25   ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 16:53     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-07 20:25       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 20:55         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-09 16:39         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 18:38           ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-05 16:10 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] SLUB bulk API interactions with kmem cgroup Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 18:16   ` [PATCH V3 " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 18:17     ` [PATCH V3 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 19:13       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 20:25         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-10  8:46           ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-10 15:55             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-10 16:17               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-10 18:32               ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-11 15:28                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-11 18:30                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-11 18:56                     ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-12 14:27                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 22:04         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-10  8:30           ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2015-11-10 15:23             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-09 18:17     ` [PATCH V3 2/2] slub: add missing kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-09 18:56       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-13 10:57   ` [PATCH V4 0/2] SLUB bulk API interactions with kmem cgroup Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-13 10:57     ` [PATCH V4 1/2] slub: fix kmem cgroup bug in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-14 11:04       ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-13 10:57     ` [PATCH V4 2/2] slub: add missing kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151110083042.GS31308@esperanza \
    --to=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox