From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Use kernel mm when updating section permissions
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:27:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105162719.GQ8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563B81DA.2080409@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 08:20:42AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 01:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:00:39PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >>Currently, read only permissions are not being applied even
> >>when CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA is set. This is because section_update
> >>uses current->mm for adjusting the page tables. current->mm
> >>need not be equivalent to the kernel version. Use pgd_offset_k
> >>to get the proper page directory for updating.
> >
> >What are you trying to achieve here? You can't use these functions
> >at run time (after the first thread has been spawned) to change
> >permissions, because there will be multiple copies of the kernel
> >section mappings, and those copies will not get updated.
> >
> >In any case, this change will probably break kexec and ftrace, as
> >the running thread will no longer see the updated page tables.
> >
>
> I think I was hitting that exact problem with multiple copies
> not getting updated. The section_update code was being called
> and I was seeing the tables get updated but nothing was being
> applied when I tried to write to text or check the debugfs
> page table. The current flow is:
>
> rest_init -> kernel_thread(kernel_init) and from that thread
> mark_rodata_ro. So mark_rodata_ro is always going to happen
> in a thread.
>
> Do we need to update for both init_mm and the first running
> thread?
The "first running thread" is merely coincidental for things like kexec.
Hmm. Actually, I think the existing code _should_ be fine. At the
point where mark_rodata_ro() is, we should still be using init_mm, so
updating the current threads page tables should actually be updating
the swapper_pg_dir.
The other cases (kexec and ftrace) I think are also fine as they
stand - we want to be changing the currently active page tables
there.
So, I really think we do not want to be using pgd_offset_k() here at
all - but we need to find out what's changed to cause (presumably)
mark_rodata_ro() not to be hitting the swapper page tables. Maybe
some debug in mark_rodata_ro() to find out what current->mm is?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 1:00 Laura Abbott
2015-11-05 1:06 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-05 1:13 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-05 9:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-05 16:20 ` Laura Abbott
2015-11-05 16:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-11-06 1:05 ` Laura Abbott
2015-11-06 1:15 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-06 18:44 ` Laura Abbott
2015-11-06 19:08 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-06 19:12 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-06 20:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-11-06 20:28 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-06 21:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-11-06 21:19 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-06 22:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-11-06 23:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-11-06 23:47 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-06 20:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-06 23:41 ` Laura Abbott
2015-11-06 23:49 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-07 0:20 ` Laura Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151105162719.GQ8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox