From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ksm: unstable_tree_search_insert error checking cleanup
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 00:45:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151101234558.GT5390@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1510251601230.1923@eggly.anvils>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 04:18:05PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > get_mergeable_page() can only return NULL (in case of errors) or the
> > pinned mergeable page. It can't return an error different than
> > NULL. This makes it more readable and less confusion in addition to
> > optimizing the check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>
> I share your sentiment, prefer to avoid an unnecessary IS_ERR_OR_NULL.
> And you may be right that it's unnecessary; but that's far from clear
> to me, and you haven't changed the IS_ERR_OR_NULL after follow_page()
> in get_mergeable_page() where it originates, so I wonder if you just
> got confused on this.
>
> Even if you have established that there's currently no way that
> follow_page(vma, addr, FOLL_GET) could return an -errno on a vma
> validated by find_mergeable_vma(), I think we'd still be better off
> to allow for some future -errno there; but I'd be happy for you to
> keep the change below, but also adjust get_mergeable_page() to
> convert an -errno immediately to NULL after follow_page().
>
> So, I think this is gently Nacked in its present form,
> but a replacement eagerly Acked.
The "out:" label is followed by page = NULL, so if follow_page returns
an error, get_mergeable_page still cannot return an error.
If this wasn't the case, get_mergeable_page would return an
uninitialized pointer if find_mergeable_vma would return NULL.
I guess the IS_ERR_OR_NULL that I removed, was the direct result of
overlooking the location of the "out:".
If there was a return after the "out:" the readability would have been
improved, but I haven't touched the code around the "out:". That's the
way it was before. Now I'll add a return in this same patch after the
"out:" before resubmitting without 1/6.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-01 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 16:04 [PATCH 0/6] KSM fixes Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-15 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] ksm: fix rmap_item->anon_vma memory corruption and vma user after free Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-26 0:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-10-30 18:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-15 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] ksm: add cond_resched() to the rmap_walks Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-25 23:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-10-27 0:32 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-11-01 22:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-15 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] ksm: don't fail stable tree lookups if walking over stale stable_nodes Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-25 23:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-11-01 23:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-15 16:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] ksm: use the helper method to do the hlist_empty check Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-25 23:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-10-15 16:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] ksm: use find_mergeable_vma in try_to_merge_with_ksm_page Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-25 23:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-10-15 16:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] ksm: unstable_tree_search_insert error checking cleanup Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-25 23:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2015-11-01 23:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2015-11-02 0:23 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151101234558.GT5390@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox