From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2B96B0257 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:13:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so62724688wic.0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ol8si5284563wic.74.2015.10.13.07.43.37 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:43:36 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: Making per-cpu lists draining dependant on a flag Message-ID: <20151013144335.GB31034@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <56179E4F.5010507@kyup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56179E4F.5010507@kyup.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Nikolay Borisov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@suse.de, Andrew Morton , Marian Marinov , SiteGround Operations On Fri 09-10-15 14:00:31, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > Hello mm people, > > > I want to ask you the following question which stemmed from analysing > and chasing this particular deadlock: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2056730 > > To summarise it: > > For simplicity I will use the following nomenclature: > t1 - kworker/u96:0 > t2 - kworker/u98:39 > t3 - kworker/u98:7 Could you be more specific about the trace of all three parties? I am not sure I am completely following your description. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org