From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <robin.m.holt@gmail.com>,
Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: New helper to free highmem pages in larger chunks
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:09:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151005150955.3e1da261449ae046e1be3989@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560FD031.3030909@synopsys.com>
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 18:25:13 +0530 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed increased boot time when enabling highmem for ARC. Turns out that
> freeing highmem pages into buddy allocator is done page at a time, while it is
> batched for low mem pages. Below is call flow.
>
> I'm thinking of writing free_highmem_pages() which takes start and end pfn and
> want to solicit some ideas whether to write it from scratch or preferably call
> existing __free_pages_memory() to reuse the logic to convert a pfn range into
> {pfn, order} tuples.
>
> For latter however there are semantical differences as you can see below which I'm
> not sure of:
> -highmem page->count is set to 1, while 0 for low mem
That would be weird.
Look more closely at __free_pages_boot_core() - it uses
set_page_refcounted() to set the page's refcount to 1. Those
set_page_count() calls look superfluous to me.
> -atomic clearing of page reserved flag vs. non atomic
I doubt if the atomic is needed - who else can be looking at this page
at this time?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-03 12:55 Vineet Gupta
2015-10-05 22:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-10-06 5:35 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-06 8:42 ` [arc-linux-dev] " Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151005150955.3e1da261449ae046e1be3989@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
--cc=robin.m.holt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox