From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] mm, proc: account for shmem swap in /proc/pid/smaps
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:57:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150925125729.GI16497@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438779685-5227-3-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>
[Sorry for a really long delay]
On Wed 05-08-15 15:01:23, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Currently, /proc/pid/smaps will always show "Swap: 0 kB" for shmem-backed
> mappings, even if the mapped portion does contain pages that were swapped out.
> This is because unlike private anonymous mappings, shmem does not change pte
> to swap entry, but pte_none when swapping the page out. In the smaps page
> walk, such page thus looks like it was never faulted in.
>
> This patch changes smaps_pte_entry() to determine the swap status for such
> pte_none entries for shmem mappings, similarly to how mincore_page() does it.
> Swapped out pages are thus accounted for.
>
> The accounting is arguably still not as precise as for private anonymous
> mappings, since now we will count also pages that the process in question never
> accessed, but only another process populated them and then let them become
> swapped out.
>
> I believe it is still less confusing and subtle than not showing
> any swap usage by shmem mappings at all. Also, swapped out pages only becomee a
> performance issue for future accesses, and we cannot predict those for neither
> kind of mapping.
Yes I agree.
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
[...]
> @@ -625,6 +626,41 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> seq_putc(m, '\n');
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SHMEM) && defined(CONFIG_SWAP)
> +static unsigned long smaps_shmem_swap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode;
> + unsigned long swapped;
> + pgoff_t start, end;
> +
> + if (!vma->vm_file)
> + return 0;
> +
> + inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
Why don't we need to take i_mutex here? What prevents from a parallel
truncate? I guess we do not care because radix_tree_for_each_slot would
cope with a truncated portion of the range, right?
It would deserve a comment I guess.
> +
> + if (!shmem_mapping(inode->i_mapping))
> + return 0;
> +
> + swapped = shmem_swap_usage(inode);
> +
> + if (swapped == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start >= inode->i_size)
> + return swapped;
> +
> + start = linear_page_index(vma, vma->vm_start);
> + end = linear_page_index(vma, vma->vm_end);
> +
> + return shmem_partial_swap_usage(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
> +}
[...]
> +unsigned long shmem_partial_swap_usage(struct address_space *mapping,
> + pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
> +{
> + struct radix_tree_iter iter;
> + void **slot;
> + struct page *page;
> + unsigned long swapped = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +restart:
> + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) {
> + if (iter.index >= end)
> + break;
> +
> + page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot);
> +
> + /*
> + * This should only be possible to happen at index 0, so we
> + * don't need to reset the counter, nor do we risk infinite
> + * restarts.
> + */
> + if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page))
> + goto restart;
> +
> + if (radix_tree_exceptional_entry(page))
> + swapped++;
> +
> + if (need_resched()) {
> + cond_resched_rcu();
> + start = iter.index + 1;
> + goto restart;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return swapped << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * SysV IPC SHM_UNLOCK restore Unevictable pages to their evictable lists.
> */
> --
> 2.4.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 13:01 [PATCH v3 0/4] enhance shmem process and swap accounting Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-05 13:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm, documentation: clarify /proc/pid/status VmSwap limitations Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-25 11:36 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-05 13:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm, proc: account for shmem swap in /proc/pid/smaps Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-25 12:57 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-08-05 13:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm, shmem: Add shmem resident memory accounting Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-25 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-05 13:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm, procfs: Display VmAnon, VmFile and VmShm in /proc/pid/status Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-05 13:21 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2015-08-27 7:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-25 13:29 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-05 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] enhance shmem process and swap accounting Konstantin Khlebnikov
2015-08-07 9:37 ` Jerome Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150925125729.GI16497@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox