From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AF56B0254 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 04:50:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pablk4 with SMTP id lk4so3465325pab.3 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 01:50:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id le8si4104033pab.136.2015.09.25.01.50.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 01:50:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pacex6 with SMTP id ex6so100217587pac.0 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 01:50:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:50:02 +0900 From: Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Message-ID: <20150925085002.GA17075@blaptop> References: <20150922141733.d7d97f59f207d0655c3b881d@gmail.com> <20150923031845.GA31207@cerebellum.local.variantweb.net> <20150923215726.GA17171@cerebellum.local.variantweb.net> <20150925021325.GA16431@bbox> <20150925084617.GA23340@blaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150925084617.GA23340@blaptop> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vitaly Wool Cc: Seth Jennings , Dan Streetman , Andrew Morton , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel , Linux-MM On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 05:47:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:17:54AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote: > > > > > I already said questions, opinion and concerns but anything is not clear > > > until now. Only clear thing I could hear is just "compaction stats are > > > better" which is not enough for me. Sorry. > > > > > > 1) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/15/33 > > > 2) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/2 > > > > Could you please stop perverting the facts, I did answer to that: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/753. > > > > Apart from that, an opinion is not necessarily something I would > > answer. Concerns about zsmalloc are not in the scope of this patch's > > discussion. If you have any concerns regarding this particular patch, > > please let us know. > > Yes, I don't want to interrupt zbud thing which is Seth should maintain > and I respect his decision but the reason I nacked is you said this patch > aims for supporing zbud into zsmalloc for determinism. zram Sorry for the typo. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org