From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arve@android.com, riandrews@android.com
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] android, lmk: Reverse the order of setting TIF_MEMDIE and sending SIGKILL.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:34:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201508270034.GEH35997.SFOMOVLFtOHFQJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201508262119.IHA93770.JOOtFHMSFLOQVF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Reposting updated version as it turned out that we can call do_send_sig_info()
with task_lock held. ;-) ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=144059948628905&w=2 )
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Should selected_tasksize be added to rem even when TIF_MEMDIE was not set?
Commit e1099a69a624 "android, lmk: avoid setting TIF_MEMDIE if process
has already exited" changed not to add selected_tasksize to rem. But I
noticed that rem is initialized to 0 and there is only one addition
(i.e. rem += selected_tasksize means rem = selected_tasksize) since
commit 7dc19d5affd7 "drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API".
I don't know what values we should return, but this patch restores
pre commit e1099a69a624 because omitting a call to mark_oom_victim()
due to race will not prevent from reclaiming memory because we already
sent SIGKILL.
------------------------------------------------------------
>From b7075abd3a1e903e88f1755c68adc017d2125b0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:13:57 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] android, lmk: Send SIGKILL before setting TIF_MEMDIE.
It was observed that setting TIF_MEMDIE before sending SIGKILL at
oom_kill_process() allows memory reserves to be depleted by allocations
which are not needed for terminating the OOM victim.
This patch reverts commit 6bc2b856bb7c ("staging: android: lowmemorykiller:
set TIF_MEMDIE before send kill sig"), for oom_kill_process() was updated
to send SIGKILL before setting TIF_MEMDIE.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
index d5d25e4..af604cf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
@@ -156,26 +156,21 @@ next:
}
if (selected) {
task_lock(selected);
- if (!selected->mm) {
- /* Already exited, cannot do mark_tsk_oom_victim() */
- task_unlock(selected);
- goto out;
- }
+ lowmem_print(1, "send sigkill to %d (%s), adj %hd, size %d\n",
+ selected->pid, selected->comm,
+ selected_oom_score_adj, selected_tasksize);
+ send_sig(SIGKILL, selected, 0);
/*
* FIXME: lowmemorykiller shouldn't abuse global OOM killer
* infrastructure. There is no real reason why the selected
* task should have access to the memory reserves.
*/
- mark_oom_victim(selected);
- lowmem_print(1, "send sigkill to %d (%s), adj %hd, size %d\n",
- selected->pid, selected->comm,
- selected_oom_score_adj, selected_tasksize);
+ if (selected->mm)
+ mark_oom_victim(selected);
task_unlock(selected);
lowmem_deathpending_timeout = jiffies + HZ;
- send_sig(SIGKILL, selected, 0);
rem += selected_tasksize;
}
-out:
lowmem_print(4, "lowmem_scan %lu, %x, return %lu\n",
sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask, rem);
rcu_read_unlock();
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-26 12:17 [PATCH 1/2] android, lmk: Protect task->comm with task_lock Tetsuo Handa
2015-08-26 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] android, lmk: Reverse the order of setting TIF_MEMDIE and sending SIGKILL Tetsuo Handa
2015-08-26 15:34 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2015-08-27 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-03 1:06 ` Greg KH
2015-09-04 14:05 ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-04 17:15 ` Greg KH
2015-09-04 18:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-09-04 20:29 ` Greg KH
2015-09-01 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] android, lmk: Protect task->comm with task_lock David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201508270034.GEH35997.SFOMOVLFtOHFQJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=riandrews@android.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox