From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/hwpoison: fix fail to split THP w/ refcount held
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:50:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150810085047.GC21282@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP6090BE1965823BCE9FBC4580700@phx.gbl>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:29:18PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi Naoya,
>
> On 8/10/15 4:10 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:32:30PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>THP pages will get a refcount in madvise_hwpoison() w/ MF_COUNT_INCREASED
> >>flag, however, the refcount is still held when fail to split THP pages.
> >>
> >>Fix it by reducing the refcount of THP pages when fail to split THP.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
> >It seems that the same conditional put_page() would be added to
> >"soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned" branch too, right?
>
> PageHWPoison() is just called before the soft_offline_page() in
> madvise_hwpoion(). I think the PageHWPosion()
> check in soft_offline_page() makes more sense for the other
> soft_offline_page() callsites which don't have the
> refcount held.
What I am worried is a race like below:
CPU0 CPU1
madvise_hwpoison
get_user_pages_fast
PageHWPoison check (false)
memory_failure
TestSetPageHWPoison
soft_offline_page
PageHWPoison check (true)
return -EBUSY (without put_page)
It's rare and madvise_hwpoison() is testing feature, so this never causes
real problems in production systems, so it's not a big deal.
My suggestion is maybe just for code correctness thing ...
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-10 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-10 6:32 Wanpeng Li
2015-08-10 8:10 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-10 8:29 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-10 8:50 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2015-08-10 9:15 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150810085047.GC21282@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox