linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] ext4: Add ext4_get_block_dax()
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:19:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150805151904.GD13681@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150805020357.GA3902@dastard>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:03:57PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:57:58PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > DAX wants different semantics from any currently-existing ext4
> > get_block callback.  Unlike ext4_get_block_write(), it needs to honour
> > the 'create' flag, and unlike ext4_get_block(), it needs to be able
> > to return unwritten extents.  So introduce a new ext4_get_block_dax()
> > which has those semantics.  We could also change ext4_get_block_write()
> > to honour the 'create' flag, but that might have consequences on other
> > users that I do not currently understand.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Doesn't this make the first patch in the series redundant?

As I explained in the cover letter, patch 1 already went to Ted.  It might
be on its way in, and it might not.  Rather than sending a patch that
applies to current mainline and forcing someone to fix up a conflict
later, better to resend the patch as part of this series, and our tools
will do the right thing no matter which order patches go into Linus' tree.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-05 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-04 19:57 [PATCH 00/11] DAX fixes for 4.3 Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Use ext4_get_block_write() for DAX Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH 02/11] thp: Change insert_pfn's return type to void Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH 03/11] dax: Improve comment about truncate race Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext4: Add ext4_get_block_dax() Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-05  2:03   ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-05 15:19     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2015-08-04 19:57 ` [PATCH 05/11] ext4: Start transaction before calling into DAX Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] dax: Fix race between simultaneous faults Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-05 11:43   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-04 19:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] thp: Decrement refcount on huge zero page if it is split Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] thp: Fix zap_huge_pmd() for DAX Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] dax: Don't use set_huge_zero_page() Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] dax: Ensure that zero pages are removed from other processes Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-04 19:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] dax: Use linear_page_index() Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150805151904.GD13681@linux.intel.com \
    --to=willy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox