linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm, oom: organize oom context into struct
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:56:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150709085602.GC13872@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1507081637540.16585@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Wed 08-07-15 16:38:25, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > 
> > There are essential elements to an oom context that are passed around to
> > multiple functions.
> > 
> > Organize these elements into a new struct, struct oom_context, that
> > specifies the context for an oom condition.
> > 
> > This patch introduces no functional change.
> > 
> > [mhocko@suse.cz: s@oom_control@oom_context@]
> > [mhocko@suse.cz: do not initialize on stack oom_context with NULL or 0]
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> 
> I hate to appear to be nacking my own patch, but it was correct when 
> included in my series

What is incorrect in this patch?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 13:04 [PATCH 0/4] oom: sysrq+f fixes + cleanups Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] oom: Do not panic when OOM killer is sysrq triggered Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:36   ` David Rientjes
2015-07-09  8:23     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-09 21:03       ` David Rientjes
2015-07-10  7:41         ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] oom: Do not invoke oom notifiers on sysrq+f Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:37   ` David Rientjes
2015-07-09  8:55     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-09 21:07       ` David Rientjes
2015-07-10  7:40         ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-14 21:58           ` David Rientjes
2015-07-15  9:42             ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-15 22:21               ` David Rientjes
2015-07-15 22:44               ` [patch -mm] mm, oom: move oom notifiers to page allocator David Rientjes
2015-07-16  7:12                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, oom: organize oom context into struct Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:38   ` David Rientjes
2015-07-09  8:56     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-07-09 21:09       ` David Rientjes
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] oom: split out forced OOM killer Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:41   ` David Rientjes
2015-07-09 10:05     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-09 21:27       ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150709085602.GC13872@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jakobunt@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox