linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] panic_on_oom_timeout
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:18:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150611141813.GA14088@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201506112212.JAG26531.FLSVFMOQJOtOHF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Thu 11-06-15 22:12:40, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > The moom_work used by SysRq-f sometimes cannot be executed
> > > because some work which is processed before the moom_work is processed is
> > > stalled for unbounded amount of time due to looping inside the memory
> > > allocator.
> > 
> > Wouldn't wq code pick up another worker thread to execute the work.
> > There is also a rescuer thread as the last resort AFAIR.
> > 
> 
> Below is an example of moom_work lockup in v4.1-rc7 from
> http://I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/tmp/serial-20150611.txt.xz
> 
> ----------
> [  171.710406] sysrq: SysRq : Manual OOM execution
> [  171.720193] kworker/2:9 invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oom_score_adj=0
> [  171.722699] kworker/2:9 cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0
> [  171.724603] CPU: 2 PID: 11016 Comm: kworker/2:9 Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7 #3
> [  171.726817] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/31/2013
> [  171.729727] Workqueue: events moom_callback
> (...snipped...)
> [  258.302016] sysrq: SysRq : Manual OOM execution

Wow, this is a _lot_. I was aware that workqueues might be overloaded.
We have seen that in real loads and that led to
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141456398425553 wher the rescuer
didn't handle pending work properly. I thought that the fix helped in
the end. But 1.5 minutes is indeed unexpected for me.

This of course disqualifies DELAYED_WORK for anything that has at least
reasonable time expectations which is the case here.

[...]

> I think that the basic rule for handling OOM condition is that "Do not trust
> anybody, for even the kswapd and rescuer threads can be waiting for lock or
> allocation. Decide when to give up at administrator's own risk, and choose
> another mm struct or call panic()".

Yes I agree with this and checking the timeout at select_bad_process
time sounds much more plausible in that regard.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-11 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-09 17:03 Michal Hocko
2015-06-10 12:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-10 14:28   ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-10 15:56     ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-12 15:23       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-15 12:45         ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-16 13:14           ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-16 13:46             ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-17 12:16               ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-17 12:36                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-11 13:12     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-11 14:18       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-06-11 14:45         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-11 15:38           ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-17 12:11 ` [RFC -v2] panic_on_oom_timeout Michal Hocko
2015-06-17 12:31   ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-17 12:51     ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-17 13:24       ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-29 11:55         ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-29 13:20           ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-17 13:59       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-17 15:41         ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-19 11:30           ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-19 15:36             ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-19 18:54               ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-06-20  7:57                 ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150611141813.GA14088@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox