From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcin Jabrzyk <m.jabrzyk@samsung.com>,
ngupta@vflare.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: check compressor name before setting it
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 22:14:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150522131447.GA14922@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150522124411.GA3793@swordfish>
Hello Sergey,
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:44:11PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (05/22/15 11:12), Marcin Jabrzyk wrote:
> > >
> > >no.
> > >
> > >zram already complains about failed comp backend creation.
> > >it's in dmesg (or syslog, etc.):
> > >
> > > "zram: Cannot initialise %s compressing backend"
> > >
> > OK, now I see that. Sorry for the noise.
> >
> > >second, there is not much value in exposing zcomp internals,
> > >especially when the result is just another line in dmesg output.
> >
> > From the other hand, the only valid values that can be written are
> > in 'comp_algorithm'.
> > So when writing other one, returning -EINVAL seems to be reasonable.
> > The user would get immediately information that he can't do that,
> > now the information can be very deferred in time.
>
> it's not.
> the error message appears in syslog right before we return -EINVAL
> back to user.
Although Marcin's description is rather misleading, I like the patch.
Every admin doesn't watch dmesg output. Even people could change loglevel
simply so KERN_INFO would be void in that case.
Instant error propagation is more strighforward for user point of view
rather than delaying with depending on another event.
Thanks.
>
> -ss
>
> > I'm not for exposing more internals, but getting -EINVAL would be nice I
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-22 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 8:31 Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-22 8:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-22 9:12 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-22 12:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-22 13:14 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2015-05-22 13:34 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 4:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-25 14:16 ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-22 13:26 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 6:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-25 6:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-25 7:15 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 7:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-25 8:05 ` Marcin Jabrzyk
2015-05-25 14:21 ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-26 0:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150522131447.GA14922@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.jabrzyk@samsung.com \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox