linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rmap: fix theoretical race between do_wp_page and shrink_active_list
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:14:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513011413.GA8267@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431425919-28057-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:18:39PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> As noted by Paul the compiler is free to store a temporary result in a
> variable on stack, heap or global unless it is explicitly marked as
> volatile, see:
> 
>   http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4455.html#sample-optimizations
> 
> This can result in a race between do_wp_page() and shrink_active_list()
> as follows.
> 
> In do_wp_page() we can call page_move_anon_rmap(), which sets
> page->mapping as follows:
> 
>   anon_vma = (void *) anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
>   page->mapping = (struct address_space *) anon_vma;
> 
> The page in question may be on an LRU list, because nowhere in
> do_wp_page() we remove it from the list, neither do we take any LRU
> related locks. Although the page is locked, shrink_active_list() can
> still call page_referenced() on it concurrently, because the latter does
> not require an anonymous page to be locked:
> 
>   CPU0                          CPU1
>   ----                          ----
>   do_wp_page                    shrink_active_list
>    lock_page                     page_referenced
>                                   PageAnon->yes, so skip trylock_page
>    page_move_anon_rmap
>     page->mapping = anon_vma
>                                   rmap_walk
>                                    PageAnon->no
>                                    rmap_walk_file
>                                     BUG
>     page->mapping += PAGE_MAPPING_ANON
> 
> This patch fixes this race by explicitly forbidding the compiler to
> split page->mapping store in page_move_anon_rmap() with the aid of
> WRITE_ONCE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> ---

The paper says "This requires escape analysis: blah blah for this optimization
to be valid" So, I'm not sure it's the case but admit we couldn't guarantee
all of compiler optimization technique so I am in favor of the patch to make
sure future-proof with upcoming suprising compiler technique.

Another review point I had is whether lockless page in shrink_active_list
could be turn into PageKsm in the middle of page_referenced. IOW,

        page_referenced
                PageAnon && !PageKsm -> true so avoid try_lockpage
                <... amount of stall start >
                Other cpu makes the page into PageKsm
                <... amount of stall end >
                rmap_walk
                  PageKsm-> true
                  rmap_walk_ksm
                    -> bang because ksm expect the passed page was locked

However, we increased page->count in isolate_lru_page before passing
the page in page_referenced so KSM cannot make the page KsmPage so
it's safe.

Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-12 10:18 Vladimir Davydov
2015-05-12 10:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-05-12 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-13  1:21   ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-13  8:08   ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-05-13  1:14 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2015-05-13  1:43 Minchan Kim
2015-05-13  2:04 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-13  3:00 Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150513011413.GA8267@blaptop \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox