From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rmap: fix theoretical race between do_wp_page and shrink_active_list
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:14:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513011413.GA8267@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431425919-28057-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:18:39PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> As noted by Paul the compiler is free to store a temporary result in a
> variable on stack, heap or global unless it is explicitly marked as
> volatile, see:
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4455.html#sample-optimizations
>
> This can result in a race between do_wp_page() and shrink_active_list()
> as follows.
>
> In do_wp_page() we can call page_move_anon_rmap(), which sets
> page->mapping as follows:
>
> anon_vma = (void *) anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
> page->mapping = (struct address_space *) anon_vma;
>
> The page in question may be on an LRU list, because nowhere in
> do_wp_page() we remove it from the list, neither do we take any LRU
> related locks. Although the page is locked, shrink_active_list() can
> still call page_referenced() on it concurrently, because the latter does
> not require an anonymous page to be locked:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> do_wp_page shrink_active_list
> lock_page page_referenced
> PageAnon->yes, so skip trylock_page
> page_move_anon_rmap
> page->mapping = anon_vma
> rmap_walk
> PageAnon->no
> rmap_walk_file
> BUG
> page->mapping += PAGE_MAPPING_ANON
>
> This patch fixes this race by explicitly forbidding the compiler to
> split page->mapping store in page_move_anon_rmap() with the aid of
> WRITE_ONCE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> ---
The paper says "This requires escape analysis: blah blah for this optimization
to be valid" So, I'm not sure it's the case but admit we couldn't guarantee
all of compiler optimization technique so I am in favor of the patch to make
sure future-proof with upcoming suprising compiler technique.
Another review point I had is whether lockless page in shrink_active_list
could be turn into PageKsm in the middle of page_referenced. IOW,
page_referenced
PageAnon && !PageKsm -> true so avoid try_lockpage
<... amount of stall start >
Other cpu makes the page into PageKsm
<... amount of stall end >
rmap_walk
PageKsm-> true
rmap_walk_ksm
-> bang because ksm expect the passed page was locked
However, we increased page->count in isolate_lru_page before passing
the page in page_referenced so KSM cannot make the page KsmPage so
it's safe.
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 10:18 Vladimir Davydov
2015-05-12 10:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-05-12 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-13 1:21 ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-13 8:08 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-05-13 1:14 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2015-05-13 1:43 Minchan Kim
2015-05-13 2:04 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-13 3:00 Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513011413.GA8267@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox