From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/memory-failure: introduce get_hwpoison_page() for consistent refcount handling
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 00:11:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513001141.GA14599@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150512150017.4172e4b7bd549e16d8772753@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:00:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 09:46:47 +0000 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>
> > memory_failrue() can run in 2 different mode (specified by MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
> > in page refcount perspective. When MF_COUNT_INCREASED is set, memory_failrue()
> > assumes that the caller takes a refcount of the target page. And if cleared,
> > memory_failure() takes it in it's own.
> >
> > In current code, however, refcounting is done differently in each caller. For
> > example, madvise_hwpoison() uses get_user_pages_fast() and hwpoison_inject()
> > uses get_page_unless_zero(). So this inconsistent refcounting causes refcount
> > failure especially for thp tail pages. Typical user visible effects are like
> > memory leak or VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(page)) in isolate_lru_page().
> >
> > To fix this refcounting issue, this patch introduces get_hwpoison_page() to
> > handle thp tail pages in the same manner for each caller of hwpoison code.
> >
> > There's a non-trivial change around unpoisoning, which now returns immediately
> > for thp with "MCE: Memory failure is now running on %#lx\n" message. This is
> > not right when split_huge_page() fails. So this patch also allows
> > unpoison_memory() to handle thp.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > /*
> > + * Get refcount for memory error handling:
> > + * - @page: raw page
> > + */
> > +inline int get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> > +
> > + if (PageHuge(head))
> > + return get_page_unless_zero(head);
> > + else if (PageTransHuge(head))
> > + if (get_page_unless_zero(head)) {
> > + if (PageTail(page))
> > + get_page(page);
> > + return 1;
> > + } else {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + else
> > + return get_page_unless_zero(page);
> > +}
>
> This function is a bit weird.
>
> - The comment looks like kerneldoc but isn't kerneldoc
OK, will fix it.
> - Why the inline? It isn't fastpath?
No, so I'll drop 'inline'.
> - The layout is rather painful. It could be
>
> if (PageHuge(head))
> return get_page_unless_zero(head);
>
> if (PageTransHuge(head)) {
> if (get_page_unless_zero(head)) {
> if (PageTail(page))
> get_page(page);
> return 1;
> } else {
> return 0;
> }
> }
>
> return get_page_unless_zero(page);
OK, will do like this.
> - Some illuminating comments would be nice. In particular that code
> path where it grabs a ref on the tail page as well as on the head
> page. What's going on there?
We can't call get_page_unless_zero() directly for thp tail pages because
that breaks thp's refcounting rule (refcount of tail pages is stored in
->_mapcount.) This code intends to comply with the rule in hwpoison code too.
So I'll comment the point.
Hmm, I found just now that I forget to put_page(head) in if (PageTail) block,
which leaks head page after thp split.
So it'll be fixed in the next version.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 9:46 [PATCH 0/4] hwpoison fixes for v4.2 Naoya Horiguchi
2015-05-12 9:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory-failure: me_huge_page() does nothing for thp Naoya Horiguchi
2015-05-12 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/memory-failure: introduce get_hwpoison_page() for consistent refcount handling Naoya Horiguchi
2015-05-12 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-13 0:11 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2015-05-12 9:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/memory-failure: split thp earlier in memory error handling Naoya Horiguchi
2015-05-12 9:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: soft-offline: don't free target page in successful page migration Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513001141.GA14599@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox