From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com (mail-qk0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CEA6B0038 for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 22:17:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by qku63 with SMTP id 63so19225305qku.3 for ; Wed, 06 May 2015 19:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com. [107.14.166.227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f2si677483qkh.53.2015.05.06.19.17.35 for ; Wed, 06 May 2015 19:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 22:17:45 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] tracing: add trace event for memory-failure Message-ID: <20150506221745.3478fd92@grimm.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150507011207.GC7745@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> References: <1429519480-11687-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com> <5540BD13.1010408@huawei.com> <20150507011207.GC7745@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: Xie XiuQi , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com" , "koct9i@gmail.com" , "hpa@linux.intel.com" , "hannes@cmpxchg.org" , "iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" , "luto@amacapital.net" , "nasa4836@gmail.com" , "gong.chen@linux.intel.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "bp@suse.de" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "jingle.chen@huawei.com" On Thu, 7 May 2015 01:12:07 +0000 Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:14:27PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote: > > Hi Naoya, > > > > Could you help to review and applied this series if possible. > > Sorry for late response, I was offline for several days due to national > holidays. > > This patchset is good to me, but I'm not sure which path it should go through. > Ordinarily, memory-failure patches go to linux-mm, but patch 3 depends on > TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM patches, so this can go to linux-next directly, or go to > linux-mm with depending patches. > > Steven, Andrew, which way do you like? > The TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() patch set went into the 4.1 merge window. It should be fine to base off of any of Linus's tags after or including 4.1-rc1. I need to start converting other trace events for 4.2. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org