linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	vinmenon@codeaurora.org, shashim@codeaurora.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	dave@stgolabs.net, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] vmstat: Avoid waking up idle-cpu to service shepherd work
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:41:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150328114138.GI27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomiqOcmZe+tAPNv_kX=+FmtMu8K=Qgze1y2SvgJ1A16NQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 09:58:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 March 2015 at 17:32, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > What's not clear to me is why that thing is allocated at all, AFAICT
> > something like:
> >
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tvec_base, tvec_bases);
> >
> > Should do the right thing and be much simpler.
> 
> Does this comment from timers.c answers your query ?
> 
>                         /*
>                          * This is for the boot CPU - we use compile-time
>                          * static initialisation because per-cpu memory isn't
>                          * ready yet and because the memory allocators are not
>                          * initialised either.
>                          */

No. The reason is because __TIMER_INITIALIZER() needs to set ->base to a
valid pointer and we cannot get a compile time pointer to per-cpu
entries because we don't know where we'll map the section, even for the
boot cpu.

This in turn means we need that boot_tvec_bases thing.

Now the reason we need to set ->base to a valid pointer is because we've
made NULL special.

Arguably we could create another special pointer, but since that's init
time only we get to add code for that will 'never' be used, more special
cases.

Its all a bit of a bother, but it makes sense.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-28 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-26  5:39 Viresh Kumar
2015-03-26 20:18 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-27  4:49   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-27  9:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-27  9:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-27 11:11         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-03-27 12:02           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-27 19:45             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-03-28  4:28             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-28 11:41               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-03-28  4:18         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-28  9:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-28 11:57             ` viresh kumar
2015-03-28 12:04               ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-28 13:44               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-29 10:24                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-30 12:02                   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-30 12:47                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-30 13:14                       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-30 13:59                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-30 16:17                           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-30 16:25                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-29 12:01                 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-29 17:24                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-30 15:08             ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-30 15:14               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-30 15:42               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-03-27 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-28  4:34   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150328114138.GI27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=shashim@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox