From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Derek <crquan@ymail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mremap should return -ENOMEM when __vm_enough_memory fail
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:39:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150313103949.GB7251@node.dhcp.inet.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426238498-21127-1-git-send-email-crquan@ymail.com>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:21:38AM -0700, Derek wrote:
> Recently I straced bash behavior in this dd zero pipe to read test,
> in part of testing under vm.overcommit_memory=2 (OVERCOMMIT_NEVER mode):
> # dd if=/dev/zero | read x
>
> The bash sub shell is calling mremap to reallocate more and more memory
> untill it finally failed -ENOMEM (I expect), or to be killed by system
> OOM killer (which should not happen under OVERCOMMIT_NEVER mode);
> But the mremap system call actually failed of -EFAULT, which is a surprise
> to me, I think it's supposed to be -ENOMEM? then I wrote this piece
> of C code testing confirmed it:
> https://gist.github.com/crquan/326bde37e1ddda8effe5
>
> The -EFAULT comes from the branch of security_vm_enough_memory_mm failure,
> underlyingly it calls __vm_enough_memory which returns only 0 for success
> or -ENOMEM; So why vma_to_resize needs to return -EFAULT in this case?
> it sounds like a mistake to me.
>
> Some more digging into git history:
> 1) Before commit 119f657c7 in May 1 2005 (pre 2.6.12 days) it was returning
> -ENOMEM for this failure;
> 2) but commit 119f657c7 changed it accidentally, to what ever is preserved
> in local ret, which happened to be -EFAULT, in a previous assignment;
> 3) then in commit 54f5de709 code refactoring, it's explicitly returning
> -EFAULT, should be wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Che <crquan@ymail.com>
> ---
> mm/mremap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
> index 57dadc0..5da81cb 100644
> --- a/mm/mremap.c
> +++ b/mm/mremap.c
> @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *vma_to_resize(unsigned long addr,
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_ACCOUNT) {
> unsigned long charged = (new_len - old_len) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> if (security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, charged))
> - goto Efault;
> + goto Enomem;
> *p = charged;
> }
Looks good to me.
But that would be nice to get rid of these pointless gotos. Just plain
return would work too.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 9:21 Derek
2015-03-13 10:39 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2015-03-13 23:08 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150313103949.GB7251@node.dhcp.inet.fi \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=crquan@ymail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox