From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1186B0038 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:50:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by wghn12 with SMTP id n12so6689696wgh.6 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 07:50:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nd13si21065551wic.74.2015.03.06.07.50.03 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Mar 2015 07:50:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:50:02 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] memory_hotplug: hyperv: fix deadlock between memory adding and onlining Message-ID: <20150306155002.GB23443@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1423736634-338-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423736634-338-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Andrew Morton , Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Tang Chen , Vlastimil Babka , David Rientjes , Fabian Frederick , Zhang Zhen , Vladimir Davydov , Wang Nan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-mm@kvack.org [Sorry for the late response] This is basically the same code posted by KY Srinivasan posted late last year (http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=141782228129426&w=2). I had objections to the implementation http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=141805109216700&w=2 On Thu 12-02-15 11:23:51, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > RESEND (with no changes) because Rafael J. Wysocki was missing in recepients. > > If newly added memory is brought online with e.g. udev rule: > SUBSYSTEM=="memory", ACTION=="add", ATTR{state}="online" > the following deadlock is observed (and easily reproducable): > > First participant, worker thread doing add_memory(): > > [ 724.948846] kworker/0:1 D ffff88000412f9c8 13248 27 2 0x00000000 > [ 724.973543] Workqueue: events hot_add_req [hv_balloon] > [ 724.991736] ffff88000412f9c8 0000000000000000 ffff88003fa1dc30 00000000000151c0 > [ 725.019725] 0000000000000246 ffff88000412ffd8 00000000000151c0 ffff88003a77a4e0 > [ 725.046486] ffff88003fa1dc30 00000001032a6000 ffff88003a7ca838 ffff88003a7ca898 > [ 725.072969] Call Trace: > [ 725.082690] [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70 > [ 725.103799] [] mutex_lock_nested+0x14b/0x470 > [ 725.122367] [] ? device_attach+0x23/0xb0 > [ 725.140992] [] device_attach+0x23/0xb0 > [ 725.159131] [] bus_probe_device+0xb0/0xe0 > [ 725.177055] [] device_add+0x443/0x650 > [ 725.195558] [] device_register+0x1e/0x30 > [ 725.213133] [] init_memory_block+0xd0/0xf0 > [ 725.231533] [] register_new_memory+0xb1/0xd0 > [ 725.250769] [] __add_pages+0x13f/0x250 > [ 725.269642] [] ? arch_add_memory+0x70/0xf0 > [ 725.288764] [] arch_add_memory+0x70/0xf0 > [ 725.306117] [] add_memory+0xef/0x1f0 > [ 725.322466] [] hot_add_req+0x33f/0xf90 [hv_balloon] > [ 725.342777] [] process_one_work+0x1df/0x4e0 > [ 725.361459] [] ? process_one_work+0x16d/0x4e0 > [ 725.380390] [] worker_thread+0x11b/0x450 > [ 725.397684] [] ? process_one_work+0x4e0/0x4e0 > [ 725.416533] [] kthread+0xf3/0x110 > [ 725.433372] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x240/0x240 > [ 725.453749] [] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > [ 725.470994] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x240/0x240 > [ 725.491469] 6 locks held by kworker/0:1/27: > [ 725.505037] #0: ("events"){......}, at: [] process_one_work+0x16d/0x4e0 > [ 725.533370] #1: ((&dm_device.ha_wrk.wrk)){......}, at: [] process_one_work+0x16d/0x4e0 > [ 725.565580] #2: (mem_hotplug.lock){......}, at: [] mem_hotplug_begin+0x5/0x80 > [ 725.594369] #3: (mem_hotplug.lock#2){......}, at: [] mem_hotplug_begin+0x4f/0x80 > [ 725.628554] #4: (mem_sysfs_mutex){......}, at: [] register_new_memory+0x33/0xd0 > [ 725.658519] #5: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [] device_attach+0x23/0xb0 > > Second participant, udev: > > [ 725.750889] systemd-udevd D ffff88003b94fc68 14016 888 530 0x00000004 > [ 725.773767] ffff88003b94fc68 0000000000000000 ffff8800034949c0 00000000000151c0 > [ 725.798332] ffffffff8210d980 ffff88003b94ffd8 00000000000151c0 ffff880037a69270 > [ 725.822841] ffff8800034949c0 0000000100000001 ffff8800034949c0 ffffffff81ff2b48 > [ 725.849184] Call Trace: > [ 725.858987] [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70 > [ 725.879231] [] mutex_lock_nested+0x14b/0x470 > [ 725.897860] [] ? mem_hotplug_begin+0x4f/0x80 > [ 725.916698] [] mem_hotplug_begin+0x4f/0x80 > [ 725.935064] [] ? mem_hotplug_begin+0x5/0x80 > [ 725.953464] [] online_pages+0x3b/0x520 > [ 725.971542] [] ? device_online+0x23/0xa0 > [ 725.989207] [] memory_subsys_online+0x64/0xc0 > [ 726.008513] [] device_online+0x6d/0xa0 > [ 726.025579] [] store_mem_state+0x5b/0xe0 > [ 726.043400] [] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 > [ 726.060506] [] sysfs_kf_write+0x48/0x60 > [ 726.077940] [] kernfs_fop_write+0x13b/0x1a0 > [ 726.099416] [] vfs_write+0xb7/0x1f0 > [ 726.115748] [] SyS_write+0x58/0xd0 > [ 726.131933] [] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 > [ 726.150691] 7 locks held by systemd-udevd/888: > [ 726.165044] #0: (sb_writers#3){......}, at: [] vfs_write+0x1b3/0x1f0 > [ 726.192422] #1: (&of->mutex){......}, at: [] kernfs_fop_write+0x66/0x1a0 > [ 726.220289] #2: (s_active#60){......}, at: [] kernfs_fop_write+0x6e/0x1a0 > [ 726.249382] #3: (device_hotplug_lock){......}, at: [] lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x15/0x50 > [ 726.281901] #4: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [] device_online+0x23/0xa0 > [ 726.308619] #5: (mem_hotplug.lock){......}, at: [] mem_hotplug_begin+0x5/0x80 > [ 726.337994] #6: (mem_hotplug.lock#2){......}, at: [] mem_hotplug_begin+0x4f/0x80 > > In short: onlining grabs device lock and then tries to do mem_hotplug_begin() > while add_memory() is between mem_hotplug_begin() and mem_hotplug_done() and it > tries grabbing device lock. > > To my understanding ACPI memory hotplug doesn't have the same issue as > device_hotplug_lock is being grabbed when the ACPI device is added. > > Solve the issue by grabbing device_hotplug_lock before doing add_memory(). If > we do that, lock_device_hotplug_sysfs() will cause syscall retry which will > eventually succeed. To support the change we need to export lock_device_hotplug/ > unlock_device_hotplug. This approach can be completely wrong though. > > Vitaly Kuznetsov (3): > driver core: export lock_device_hotplug/unlock_device_hotplug > memory_hotplug: add note about holding device_hotplug_lock and > add_memory() > Drivers: hv: balloon: fix deadlock between memory adding and onlining > > drivers/base/core.c | 2 ++ > drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c | 10 ++++++++++ > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 6 +++++- > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > 1.9.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org