From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3472B6B0038 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:13:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by wibhm9 with SMTP id hm9so18400872wib.2 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:13:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org. [2001:770:15f::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n9si37441672wia.101.2015.03.05.13.13.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:13:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 22:13:06 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: Resurrecting the VM_PINNED discussion Message-ID: <20150305211306.GV21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150303174105.GA3295@akamai.com> <20150305204632.GT21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Eric B Munson , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Roland Dreier , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , Mike Marciniszyn On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 03:09:42PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > Am I missing something about why it was never merged? > > > > Because I got lost in IB code and didn't manage to bribe anyone into > > fixing that for me. > > Well the complexity increased since then with the on demand pinning, > mmu notifiers etc etc ... Clearly I've not been paying attention, what? Is this that drug induced stuff benh was babbling about a while back? > I thought the clear distinction between pinning and mlocking would do the > trick? Nah, it still leaves the accounting up shit creek. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org