From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (mail-pd0-f176.google.com [209.85.192.176]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA246B0038 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 15:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by pdev10 with SMTP id v10so8748155pde.13 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id on8si10937008pdb.242.2015.03.05.12.46.42 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:46:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: Resurrecting the VM_PINNED discussion Message-ID: <20150305204632.GT21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150303174105.GA3295@akamai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150303174105.GA3295@akamai.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Eric B Munson Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Roland Dreier , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , Mike Marciniszyn On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:41:05PM -0500, Eric B Munson wrote: > All, > > After LSF/MM last year Peter revived a patch set that would create > infrastructure for pinning pages as opposed to simply locking them. > AFAICT, there was no objection to the set, it just needed some help > from the IB folks. > > Am I missing something about why it was never merged? Because I got lost in IB code and didn't manage to bribe anyone into fixing that for me. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org