From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, rientjes@google.com, david@fromorbit.com,
tytso@mit.edu, mgorman@suse.de,
penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
vipul@chelsio.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] sparc: remove __GFP_NOFAIL reuquirement
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 21:33:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150302203304.GA20513@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150302.150405.2072800922470200977.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon 02-03-15 15:04:05, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:54:42 +0100
>
> > mdesc_kmalloc is currently requiring __GFP_NOFAIL allocation although it
> > seems that the allocation failure is handled by all callers (via
> > mdesc_alloc). __GFP_NOFAIL is a strong liability for the memory
> > allocator and so the users are discouraged to use the flag unless the
> > allocation failure is really a nogo. Drop the flag here as this doesn't
> > seem to be the case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
>
> It is a serious failure.
>
> If we miss an MDESC update due to this allocation failure, the update
> is not an event which gets retransmitted so we will lose the updated
> machine description forever.
>
> We really need this allocation to succeed.
OK, thanks for the clarification. This wasn't clear from the commit
which has introduced this code. I will drop this patch. Would you
accept something like the following instead?
---
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c
index 99632a87e697..26c80e18d7b1 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c
@@ -130,26 +130,26 @@ static struct mdesc_mem_ops memblock_mdesc_ops = {
static struct mdesc_handle *mdesc_kmalloc(unsigned int mdesc_size)
{
unsigned int handle_size;
+ struct mdesc_handle *hp;
+ unsigned long addr;
void *base;
handle_size = (sizeof(struct mdesc_handle) -
sizeof(struct mdesc_hdr) +
mdesc_size);
+ /*
+ * Allocation has to succeed because mdesc update would be missed
+ * and such events are not retransmitted.
+ */
base = kmalloc(handle_size + 15, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
- if (base) {
- struct mdesc_handle *hp;
- unsigned long addr;
-
- addr = (unsigned long)base;
- addr = (addr + 15UL) & ~15UL;
- hp = (struct mdesc_handle *) addr;
+ addr = (unsigned long)base;
+ addr = (addr + 15UL) & ~15UL;
+ hp = (struct mdesc_handle *) addr;
- mdesc_handle_init(hp, handle_size, base);
- return hp;
- }
+ mdesc_handle_init(hp, handle_size, base);
- return NULL;
+ return hp;
}
static void mdesc_kfree(struct mdesc_handle *hp)
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 13:54 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clarify and cleanup some __GFP_NOFAIL usage Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 1/4] mm: Clarify __GFP_NOFAIL deprecation status Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 20:34 ` David Rientjes
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 2/4] jbd2: revert must-not-fail allocation loops back to GFP_NOFAIL Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 20:33 ` David Rientjes
2015-03-02 21:42 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 3/4] sparc: remove __GFP_NOFAIL reuquirement Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 20:04 ` David Miller
2015-03-02 20:33 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-03-02 20:44 ` David Miller
2015-03-02 21:36 ` [PATCH] sparc: clarify __GFP_NOFAIL allocation Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 21:45 ` David Miller
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 4/4] cxgb4: drop " Michal Hocko
2015-03-03 12:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-03 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150302203304.GA20513@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vipul@chelsio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox