linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, rientjes@google.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	tytso@mit.edu, mgorman@suse.de,
	penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	vipul@chelsio.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] sparc: remove __GFP_NOFAIL reuquirement
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 21:33:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150302203304.GA20513@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150302.150405.2072800922470200977.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon 02-03-15 15:04:05, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Date: Mon,  2 Mar 2015 14:54:42 +0100
> 
> > mdesc_kmalloc is currently requiring __GFP_NOFAIL allocation although it
> > seems that the allocation failure is handled by all callers (via
> > mdesc_alloc). __GFP_NOFAIL is a strong liability for the memory
> > allocator and so the users are discouraged to use the flag unless the
> > allocation failure is really a nogo. Drop the flag here as this doesn't
> > seem to be the case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> 
> It is a serious failure.
> 
> If we miss an MDESC update due to this allocation failure, the update
> is not an event which gets retransmitted so we will lose the updated
> machine description forever.
> 
> We really need this allocation to succeed.

OK, thanks for the clarification. This wasn't clear from the commit
which has introduced this code. I will drop this patch. Would you
accept something like the following instead?
---
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c
index 99632a87e697..26c80e18d7b1 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c
@@ -130,26 +130,26 @@ static struct mdesc_mem_ops memblock_mdesc_ops = {
 static struct mdesc_handle *mdesc_kmalloc(unsigned int mdesc_size)
 {
 	unsigned int handle_size;
+	struct mdesc_handle *hp;
+	unsigned long addr;
 	void *base;
 
 	handle_size = (sizeof(struct mdesc_handle) -
 		       sizeof(struct mdesc_hdr) +
 		       mdesc_size);
 
+	/*
+	 * Allocation has to succeed because mdesc update would be missed
+	 * and such events are not retransmitted.
+	 */
 	base = kmalloc(handle_size + 15, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
-	if (base) {
-		struct mdesc_handle *hp;
-		unsigned long addr;
-
-		addr = (unsigned long)base;
-		addr = (addr + 15UL) & ~15UL;
-		hp = (struct mdesc_handle *) addr;
+	addr = (unsigned long)base;
+	addr = (addr + 15UL) & ~15UL;
+	hp = (struct mdesc_handle *) addr;
 
-		mdesc_handle_init(hp, handle_size, base);
-		return hp;
-	}
+	mdesc_handle_init(hp, handle_size, base);
 
-	return NULL;
+	return hp;
 }
 
 static void mdesc_kfree(struct mdesc_handle *hp)

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-02 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02 13:54 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clarify and cleanup some __GFP_NOFAIL usage Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 1/4] mm: Clarify __GFP_NOFAIL deprecation status Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 20:34   ` David Rientjes
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 2/4] jbd2: revert must-not-fail allocation loops back to GFP_NOFAIL Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 20:33   ` David Rientjes
2015-03-02 21:42     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 3/4] sparc: remove __GFP_NOFAIL reuquirement Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 20:04   ` David Miller
2015-03-02 20:33     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-03-02 20:44       ` David Miller
2015-03-02 21:36         ` [PATCH] sparc: clarify __GFP_NOFAIL allocation Michal Hocko
2015-03-02 21:45           ` David Miller
2015-03-02 13:54 ` [RFC 4/4] cxgb4: drop " Michal Hocko
2015-03-03 12:22   ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-03 13:18     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150302203304.GA20513@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vipul@chelsio.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox