Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] mm/cma: change fallback behaviour for CMA freepage

[Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>]

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:15:46PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> freepage with MIGRATE_CMA can be used only for MIGRATE_MOVABLE and
> they should not be expanded to other migratetype buddy list
> to protect them from unmovable/reclaimable allocation. Implementing
> these requirements in __rmqueue_fallback(), that is, finding largest
> possible block of freepage has bad effect that high order freepage
> with MIGRATE_CMA are broken continually although there are suitable
> order CMA freepage. Reason is that they are not be expanded to other
> migratetype buddy list and next __rmqueue_fallback() invocation try to
> finds another largest block of freepage and break it again. So,
> MIGRATE_CMA fallback should be handled separately. This patch
> introduces __rmqueue_cma_fallback(), that just wrapper of
> __rmqueue_smallest() and call it before __rmqueue_fallback()
> if migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
> 
> This results in unintended behaviour change that MIGRATE_CMA freepage
> is always used first rather than other migratetype as movable
> allocation's fallback. But, as already mentioned above,
> MIGRATE_CMA can be used only for MIGRATE_MOVABLE, so it is better
> to use MIGRATE_CMA freepage first as much as possible. Otherwise,
> we needlessly take up precious freepages with other migratetype and
> increase chance of fragmentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---

Hello, Vlastimil.

This RFC is targeted to you, but, I mistakenly omit your e-mail
on CC list. Sorry about that. :/

How about this v3 which try to clean-up __rmqueue_fallback() much more?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>