From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249676B0032 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:33:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y19so2867814wgg.4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de. [213.95.11.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id km10si35414614wjc.32.2015.01.12.04.33.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:33:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:33:51 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] block_dev: only write bdev inode on close Message-ID: <20150112123351.GA29325@lst.de> References: <1420739133-27514-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1420739133-27514-5-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150111173209.GK25319@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150111173209.GK25319@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , David Howells , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:32:09PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > Is this an optimization or something necessary for the following > changes? If latter, maybe it's a good idea to state why this is > necessary in the description? Otherwise, It gets rid of a bdi reassignment, and thus makes life a lot simpler. I'll update the commit message. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org