* [tj-misc:review-wq-dump 1/15] lib/bitmap.c:574:6: sparse: symbol 'bitmap_print_list' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2014-12-09 19:38 kbuild test robot
2014-12-09 19:38 ` [PATCH tj-misc] bitmap: bitmap_print_list() can be static kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2014-12-09 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: kbuild-all, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
Rasmus Villemoes, Sudeep Holla, Michal Nazarewicz, linux-kernel
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git review-wq-dump
head: c48dd4e1a0d7225c97d7294958dd8ba6be82fde9
commit: 069dcda94642807dc31bf52895bd409512531249 [1/15] bitmap: restructure bitmap_sn[list]printf()
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 069dcda94642807dc31bf52895bd409512531249
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> lib/bitmap.c:574:6: sparse: symbol 'bitmap_print_list' was not declared. Should it be static?
lib/bitmap.c:1250:30: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
lib/bitmap.c:1250:30: expected unsigned long [unsigned] [long] <noident>
lib/bitmap.c:1250:30: got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident>
lib/bitmap.c:1252:30: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
lib/bitmap.c:1252:30: expected unsigned long [unsigned] [long] <noident>
lib/bitmap.c:1252:30: got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH tj-misc] bitmap: bitmap_print_list() can be static
2014-12-09 19:38 [tj-misc:review-wq-dump 1/15] lib/bitmap.c:574:6: sparse: symbol 'bitmap_print_list' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2014-12-09 19:38 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2014-12-09 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: kbuild-all, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
Rasmus Villemoes, Sudeep Holla, Michal Nazarewicz, linux-kernel
lib/bitmap.c:574:6: sparse: symbol 'bitmap_print_list' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
bitmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
index c5dd40e..dc43a01 100644
--- a/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static inline void bscnl_emit(int rbot, int rtop, bool first,
printfn(printfn_data, "%d-%d", rbot, rtop);
}
-void bitmap_print_list(const unsigned long *maskp, int nmaskbits,
+static void bitmap_print_list(const unsigned long *maskp, int nmaskbits,
bitmap_printfn_t printfn, void *printfn_data)
{
bool first = true;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-09 19:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-09 19:38 [tj-misc:review-wq-dump 1/15] lib/bitmap.c:574:6: sparse: symbol 'bitmap_print_list' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2014-12-09 19:38 ` [PATCH tj-misc] bitmap: bitmap_print_list() can be static kbuild test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox