linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Andrea Argangeli <andrea@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Daniel Forrest <dan.forrest@ssec.wisc.edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: anon_vma accumulating for certain load still not addressed
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:08:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141114130822.GC22857@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)

Hi,
back in 2012 [1] there was a discussion about a forking load which
accumulates anon_vmas. There was a trivial test case which triggers this
and can potentially deplete the memory by local user.

We have a report for an older enterprise distribution where nsd is
suffering from this issue most probably (I haven't debugged it throughly
but accumulating anon_vma structs over time sounds like a good enough
fit) and has to be restarted after some time to release the accumulated
anon_vma objects.

There was a patch which tried to work around the issue [2] but I do not
see any follow ups nor any indication that the issue would be addressed
in other way. 

The test program from [1] was running for around 39 mins on my laptop
and here is the result:

$ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
1415960225
anon_vma           11664  11900    160   25    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata    476    476      0

$ ./a # The reproducer

$ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
1415962592
anon_vma           34875  34875    160   25    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata   1395   1395      0

$ killall a
$ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
1415962607
anon_vma           11277  12175    160   25    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata    487    487      0

So we have accumulated 23211 objects over that time period before the
offender was killed which released all of them.

The proposed workaround is kind of ugly but do people have a better idea
than reference counting? If not should we merge it?

---
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/15/765
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/3/568
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2014-11-14 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-14 13:08 Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-11-14 15:06 ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-14 17:10   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141114130822.GC22857@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.forrest@ssec.wisc.edu \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox