linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm, compaction: more focused lru and pcplists draining
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:05:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141114070501.GA24817@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5464A84C.1040903@suse.cz>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/04/2014 01:37 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:12:33AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>On 10/27/2014 08:41 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:33:39PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>>
> >>>And, I wonder why last_migrated_pfn is set after isolate_migratepages().
> >>
> >>Not sure I understand your question. With the mistake above, it
> >>cannot currently be set at the point isolate_migratepages() is
> >>called, so you might question the goto check_drain in the
> >>ISOLATE_NONE case, if that's what you are wondering about.
> >>
> >>When I correct that, it might be set when COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages
> >>are isolated and migrated the middle of a pageblock, and then the
> >>rest of the pageblock contains no pages that could be isolated, so
> >>the last isolate_migratepages() attempt in the pageblock returns
> >>with ISOLATE_NONE. Still there were some migrations that produced
> >>free pages that should be drained at that point.
> >
> >To clarify my question, I attach psuedo code that I thought correct.
> 
> Sorry for the late reply.
> 
> >static int compact_zone()
> >{
> >         unsigned long last_migrated_pfn = 0;
> >
> >         ...
> >
> >         compaction_suitable();
> >
> >         ...
> >
> >         while (compact_finished()) {
> >                 if (!last_migrated_pfn)
> >                         last_migrated_pfn = cc->migrate_pfn - 1;
> >
> >                 isolate_migratepages();
> >                 switch case
> >                 migrate_pages();
> >                 ...
> >
> >                 check_drain: (at the end of loop)
> >                         do flush and reset last_migrated_pfn if needed
> >         }
> >}
> >
> >We should record last_migrated_pfn before isolate_migratepages() and
> >then compare it with cc->migrate_pfn after isolate_migratepages() to
> >know if we moved away from the previous cc->order aligned block.
> >Am I missing something?
> 
> What about this scenario, with pageblock order:
> 
> - record cc->migrate_pfn pointing to pageblock X
> - isolate_migratepages() skips the pageblock due to e.g. skip bit,
> or the pageblock being a THP already...
> - loop to pageblock X+1, last_migrated_pfn is still set to pfn of
> pageblock X (more precisely the pfn is (X << pageblock_order) - 1
> per your code, but doesn't matter)
> - isolate_migratepages isolates something, but ends up somewhere in
> the middle of pageblock due to COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX
> - cc->migrate_pfn points to pageblock X+1 (plus some pages it scanned)
> - so it will decide that it has fully migrated pageblock X and it's
> time to drain. But the drain is most likely useless - we didn't
> migrate anything in pageblock X, we skipped it. And in X+1 we didn't
> migrate everything yet, so we should drain only after finishing the
> other part of the pageblock.

Yes, but, it can be easily fixed.

  while (compact_finished()) {
          unsigned long prev_migrate_pfn = cc->migrate_pfn;

          isolate_migratepages()
          switch case {
                  NONE:
                  goto check_drain;
                  SUCCESS:
                  if (!last_migrated_pfn)
                          last_migrated_pfn = prev_migrate_pfn;
          }

          ...

          check_drain: (at the end of loop)
                ...
}

> In short, "last_migrated_pfn" is not "last position of migrate
> scanner" but "last block where we *actually* migrated".

Okay. Now I get it.
Nevertheless, I'd like to change logic like above.

One problem of your approach is that it can't detect some cases.

Let's think about following case.
'|' denotes aligned block boundary.
'^' denotes migrate_pfn at certain time.

Assume that last_migrated_pfn = 0;

|--------------|-------------|--------------|
   ^                ^
  before isolate   after isolate

In this case, your code just records position of second '^' to
last_migrated_pfn and skip to flush. But, flush is needed if we
migrate some pages because we move away from previous aligned block.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-14  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07 15:33 [PATCH 0/5] Further compaction tuning Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm, compaction: pass classzone_idx and alloc_flags to watermark checking Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-20 15:45   ` Rik van Riel
2014-10-27  6:46   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-27  9:11     ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-28  7:16       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-29 13:51         ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-31  7:49           ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-11-14  8:52             ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm, compaction: simplify deferred compaction Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-15 22:32   ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-16 15:11     ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm, compaction: defer only on COMPACT_COMPLETE Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-20 15:18   ` Rik van Riel
2014-10-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm, compaction: always update cached scanner positions Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-20 15:26   ` Rik van Riel
2014-10-27  7:35   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-27  9:39     ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-28  7:08       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-31 15:53         ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-11-04  0:28           ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-11-14  8:57             ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm, compaction: more focused lru and pcplists draining Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-20 15:44   ` Rik van Riel
2014-10-27  7:41   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-11-03  8:12     ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-11-04  0:37       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-11-13 12:47         ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-11-14  7:05           ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2014-11-19 22:53             ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141114070501.GA24817@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox