Re: [Bug 87891] New: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2625!

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:22:45 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:02:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:54:01 +0000 Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:49:13 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > But anyway - Luke, please attach your .config to
> > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87891?
> > > 
> > > Done: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=157381
> > > 
> > 
> > OK, thanks.  No CONFIG_HIGHMEM of course.  I'm stumped.
> 
> Hello, Andrew.
> 
> I think that the cause is GFP_HIGHMEM.
> GFP_HIGHMEM is always defined regardless CONFIG_HIGHMEM.
> Please look at the do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page().
> It calls alloc_hugepage_vma() and then alloc_pages_vma() is called
> with alloc_hugepage_gfpmask(). This gfpmask includes GFP_TRANSHUGE
> and then GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE.

OK.

So where's the bug?  I'm inclined to say that it's in ttm.  It's taking
a gfp_mask which means "this is the allocation attempt which we are
attempting to satisfy" and uses that for its own allocation.

But ttm has no business using that gfp_mask for its own allocation
attempt.  If anything it should use something like, err,

	GFP_KERNEL & ~__GFP_IO & ~__GFP_FS | __GFP_HIGH

although as I mentioned earlier, it would be better to avoid allocation
altogether.

Poor ttm guys - this is a bit of a trap we set for them.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>