Re: [patch 1/3] mm: embed the memcg pointer directly into struct page

[Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>]

Hi Joonsoo,

On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:02:08PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 11:15:54PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Memory cgroups used to have 5 per-page pointers.  To allow users to
> > disable that amount of overhead during runtime, those pointers were
> > allocated in a separate array, with a translation layer between them
> > and struct page.
> 
> Hello, Johannes.
> 
> I'd like to leave this translation layer.
> Could you just disable that code with #ifdef until next user comes?
> 
> In our company, we uses PAGE_OWNER on mm tree which is the feature
> saying who allocates the page. To use PAGE_OWNER needs modifying
> struct page and then needs re-compile. This re-compile makes us difficult
> to use this feature. So, we decide to implement run-time configurable
> PAGE_OWNER through page_cgroup's translation layer code. Moreover, with
> this infrastructure, I plan to implement some other debugging feature.
> 
> Because of my laziness, it didn't submitted to LKML. But, I will
> submit it as soon as possible. If the code is removed, I would
> copy-and-paste the code, but, it would cause lose of the history on
> that code. So if possible, I'd like to leave that code now.

Please re-introduce this code when your new usecase is ready to be
upstreamed.  There is little reason to burden an unrelated feature
with a sizable chunk of dead code for a vague future user.

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>