From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.17] mm, thp: fix collapsing of hugepages on madvise
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:03:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141006150351.GA23754@node.dhcp.inet.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410041947080.7055@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 07:48:04PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> If an anonymous mapping is not allowed to fault thp memory and then
> madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) is used after fault, khugepaged will never
> collapse this memory into thp memory.
>
> This occurs because the madvise(2) handler for thp, hugepage_advise(),
> clears VM_NOHUGEPAGE on the stack and it isn't stored in vma->vm_flags
> until the final action of madvise_behavior(). This causes the
> khugepaged_enter_vma_merge() to be a no-op in hugepage_advise() when the
> vma had previously had VM_NOHUGEPAGE set.
>
> Fix this by passing the correct vma flags to the khugepaged mm slot
> handler. There's no chance khugepaged can run on this vma until after
> madvise_behavior() returns since we hold mm->mmap_sem.
>
> It would be possible to clear VM_NOHUGEPAGE directly from vma->vm_flags
> in hugepage_advise(), but I didn't want to introduce special case
> behavior into madvise_behavior(). I think it's best to just let it
> always set vma->vm_flags itself.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Okay, I've looked once again and it seems your approach is better.
Although, I don't like that we need to pass down vma->vm_flags to every
khugepaged_enter() and khugepaged_enter_vma_merge().
My proposal is below. Build-tested only.
And I don't think this is subject for stable@: no crash or serious
misbehaviour. Registering to khugepaged is postponed until first page
fault. Not a big deal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-06 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-05 2:48 David Rientjes
2014-10-05 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-05 18:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-10-05 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-06 9:42 ` David Rientjes
2014-10-06 15:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2014-10-06 20:53 ` David Rientjes
2014-10-15 21:13 ` [patch resend] " David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141006150351.GA23754@node.dhcp.inet.fi \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox