Re: RFC: get_user_pages_locked|unlocked to leverage VM_FAULT_RETRY

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:50:52PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:31:17PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:36:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > For all these and the other _fast() users, is there an actual limit to
> > > the nr_pages passed in? Because we used to have the 64 pages limit from
> > > DIO, but without that we get rather long IRQ-off latencies.
> > 
> > Ok, I would tend to think this is an issue to solve in gup_fast
> > implementation, I wouldn't blame or modify the callers for it.
> > 
> > I don't think there's anything that prevents gup_fast to enable irqs
> > after certain number of pages have been taken, nop; and disable the
> > irqs again.
> > 
> 
> Agreed, I once upon a time had a patch set converting the 2 (x86 and
> powerpc) gup_fast implementations at the time, but somehow that never
> got anywhere.
> 
> Just saying we should probably do that before we add callers with
> unlimited nr_pages.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/24/457

Clearly there's more work these days. Many more archs grew a gup.c

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>