linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>,
	juno.choi@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] zram: add swap full hint
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:17:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923141755.b7854bae484cfe434797be02@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140923045602.GC8325@bbox>

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:56:02 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:

> > 
> > > +#define ZRAM_FULLNESS_PERCENT 80
> > 
> > We've had problems in the past where 1% is just too large an increment
> > for large systems.
> 
> So, do you want fullness_bytes like dirty_bytes?

Firstly I'd like you to think about whether we're ever likely to have
similar granularity problems with this tunable.  If not then forget
about it.

If yes then we should do something.  I don't like the "bytes" thing
much because it requires that the operator know the pool size
beforehand, and any time that changes, the "bytes" needs hanging too. 
Ratios are nice but percent is too coarse.  Maybe kernel should start
using "ppm" for ratios, parts per million.  hrm.

> > > @@ -711,6 +732,7 @@ static void zram_reset_device(struct zram *zram, bool reset_capacity)
> > >  	down_write(&zram->init_lock);
> > >  
> > >  	zram->limit_pages = 0;
> > > +	atomic_set(&zram->alloc_fail, 0);
> > >  
> > >  	if (!init_done(zram)) {
> > >  		up_write(&zram->init_lock);
> > > @@ -944,6 +966,34 @@ static int zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev,
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int zram_full(struct block_device *bdev, void *arg)
> > 
> > This could return a bool.  That implies that zram_swap_hint should
> > return bool too, but as we haven't been told what the zram_swap_hint
> > return value does, I'm a bit stumped.
> 
> Hmm, currently, SWAP_FREE doesn't use return and SWAP_FULL uses return
> as bool so in the end, we can change it as bool but I want to remain it
> as int for the future. At least, we might use it as propagating error
> in future. Instead, I will use *arg to return the result instead of
> return val. But I'm not strong so if you want to remove return val,
> I will do it. For clarifictaion, please tell me again if you want.

I'm easy, as long as it makes sense, is understandable by people other
than he-who-wrote-it and doesn't use argument names such as "arg".


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-23 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-22  0:03 [PATCH v1 0/5] stop anon reclaim when zram is full Minchan Kim
2014-09-22  0:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] zram: generalize swap_slot_free_notify Minchan Kim
2014-09-22 20:41   ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-23  4:45     ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-22  0:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] mm: add full variable in swap_info_struct Minchan Kim
2014-09-22 20:45   ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-23  4:45     ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-24  2:53   ` Dan Streetman
2014-09-24  7:57     ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-22  0:03 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] mm: VM can be aware of zram fullness Minchan Kim
2014-09-24 14:12   ` Dan Streetman
2014-09-25  1:06     ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-25  1:31       ` Dan Streetman
2014-09-22  0:03 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] zram: add swap full hint Minchan Kim
2014-09-22 21:11   ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-23  4:56     ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-23 21:17       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-09-24  7:57         ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-24 15:10         ` Jerome Marchand
2014-09-25  1:07           ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-24 14:01   ` Dan Streetman
2014-09-25  1:02     ` Minchan Kim
2014-09-25 15:52       ` Dan Streetman
2014-10-06 23:36         ` Minchan Kim
2014-10-06 23:46           ` Minchan Kim
2014-10-08 18:29             ` Dan Streetman
2014-09-22  0:03 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] zram: add fullness knob to control swap full Minchan Kim
2014-09-22 21:17   ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-23  4:57     ` Minchan Kim
2014-12-02  3:04 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] stop anon reclaim when zram is full Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140923141755.b7854bae484cfe434797be02@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=juno.choi@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=semenzato@google.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox