Re: [PATCH] slab: implement kmalloc guard

[Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:32:52PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > 
> > > I don't know what you mean. If someone allocates 10000 objects with sizes
> > > from 1 to 10000, you can't have 10000 slab caches - you can't have a slab
> > > cache for each used size. Also - you can't create a slab cache in
> > > interrupt context.
> > 
> > Oh you can create them up front on bootup. And I think only the small
> > sizes matter. Allocations >=8K are pushed to the page allocator anyways.
> 
> Only for SLUB. For SLAB, large allocations are still use SLAB caches up to 
> 4M. But anyway - having 8K preallocated slab caches is too much.
> 
> If you want to integrate this patch into the slab/slub subsystem, a better 
> solution would be to store the exact size requested with kmalloc along the 
> slab/slub object itself (before the preceding redzone). But it would 
> result in duplicating the work - you'd have to repeat the logic in this 
> patch three times - once for slab, once for slub and once for 
> kmalloc_large/kmalloc_large_node.
> 
> I don't know if it would be better than this patch.

Hello,

Out of bound write could be detected by kernel address asanitizer(KASan).
See following link.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/441

Although this patch also looks good to me, I think that KASan is
better than this, because it could detect out of bound write and
has more features for debugging.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>