From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
jroedel@suse.de, Jay.Cornwall@amd.com, Oded.Gabbay@amd.com,
John.Bridgman@amd.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
ben.sander@amd.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmu_notifier: Add mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:16:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140725131639.698f18ff@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406212541-25975-2-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org>
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:35:39 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> This notifier closes an important gap with the current
> invalidate_range_start()/end() notifiers. The _start() part
> is called when all pages are still mapped while the _end()
> notifier is called when all pages are potentially unmapped
> and already freed.
>
> This does not allow to manage external (non-CPU) hardware
> TLBs with MMU-notifiers because there is no way to prevent
> that hardware will establish new TLB entries between the
> calls of these two functions. But this is a requirement to
> the subsytem that implements these existing notifiers.
>
> To allow managing external TLBs the MMU-notifiers need to
> catch the moment when pages are unmapped but not yet freed.
> This new notifier catches that moment and notifies the
> interested subsytem when pages that were unmapped are about
> to be freed. The new notifier will only be called between
> invalidate_range_start()/end().
So if we were actually sharing page tables, we should be able to make
start/end no-ops and just use this new callback, assuming we didn't
need to do any other serialization or debug stuff, right?
Seems like a good addition, and saves us a bunch of trouble...
Thanks,
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-24 14:35 [PATCH 0/3] mmu_notifier: Allow to manage CPU external TLBs Joerg Roedel
2014-07-24 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmu_notifier: Add mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() Joerg Roedel
2014-07-25 20:16 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2014-07-25 20:43 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-25 21:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-07-25 21:42 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-07-25 21:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-07-25 21:47 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-24 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmu_notifier: Call mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() from VMM Joerg Roedel
2014-07-24 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmu_notifier: Add the call-back for mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() Joerg Roedel
2014-07-24 14:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] mmu_notifier: Allow to manage CPU external TLBs Andrea Arcangeli
2014-07-24 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-25 3:10 ` Sander, Ben
2014-07-25 7:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-07-29 16:18 [PATCH 0/3 v2] " Joerg Roedel
2014-07-29 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmu_notifier: Add mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() Joerg Roedel
2014-09-09 15:43 [PATCH 0/3 v3] mmu_notifier: Allow to manage CPU external TLBs Joerg Roedel
2014-09-09 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmu_notifier: Add mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() Joerg Roedel
2014-10-28 17:13 [PATCH 0/3 v4] mmu_notifier: Allow to manage CPU external TLBs Joerg Roedel
2014-10-28 17:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmu_notifier: Add mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140725131639.698f18ff@jbarnes-desktop \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=Jay.Cornwall@amd.com \
--cc=John.Bridgman@amd.com \
--cc=Oded.Gabbay@amd.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben.sander@amd.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox