From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg: export knobs for the defaul cgroup hierarchy
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:07:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140721090724.GA8393@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718154443.GM27940@esperanza>
On Fri 18-07-14 19:44:43, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:58:14AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> > > + {
> > > + .name = "kmem.limit_in_bytes",
> > > + .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_KMEM, RES_LIMIT),
> > > + .write = mem_cgroup_write,
> > > + .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read_u64,
> > > + },
> >
> > Does it really make sense to have a separate limit for kmem only?
> > IIRC, the reason we introduced this was that this memory is not
> > reclaimable and so we need to limit it.
> >
> > But the opposite effect happened: because it's not reclaimable, the
> > separate kmem limit is actually unusable for any values smaller than
> > the overall memory limit: because there is no reclaim mechanism for
> > that limit, once you hit it, it's over, there is nothing you can do
> > anymore. The problem isn't so much unreclaimable memory, the problem
> > is unreclaimable limits.
> >
> > If the global case produces memory pressure through kernel memory
> > allocations, we reclaim page cache, anonymous pages, inodes, dentries
> > etc. I think the same should happen for kmem: kmem should just be
> > accounted and limited in the overall memory limit of a group, and when
> > pressure arises, we go after anything that's reclaimable.
>
> Personally, I don't think there's much sense in having a separate knob
> for kmem limit either. Until we have a user with a sane use case for it,
> let's not propagate it to the new interface.
What about fork-bomb forks protection? I thought that was the primary usecase
for K < U? Or how can we handle that use case with a single limit? A
special gfp flag to not trigger OOM path when called from some kmem
charge paths?
What about task_count or what was the name of the controller which was
dropped and suggested to be replaced by kmem accounting? I can imagine
that to be implemented by a separate K limit which would be roughtly
stack_size * task_count + pillow for slab.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 14:39 Michal Hocko
2014-07-16 15:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-17 13:45 ` Michal Hocko
2014-07-18 15:44 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-07-18 16:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-21 9:07 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-07-21 11:46 ` Michal Hocko
2014-07-21 12:02 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-21 12:03 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-07-21 12:49 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-21 11:48 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-07-21 12:09 ` Michal Hocko
2014-07-21 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140721090724.GA8393@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox