From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:47:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140721084737.GA10016@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405478082-30757-3-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:34:41PM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote:
> When Uncorrected error happens, an MCE will be raised. Some
> notification callbacks will be called in MCE context. If
> some notification call printk it will cause potential
> deadlock because MCE can preempt normal interrupts like NMI does.
>
> Since printk is not safe in MCE context. So a lock-less memory
> allocator (genpool) is used to save information which are
> organized via a lock-less list. Print will be delayed into IRQ
> context via irq_work. This idea is inspired by APEI/GHES driver.
This patch is overengineered even though we already have both process
context work and irq work facilities in place.
We also already have mce_ring where we add MCE signatures in #MC
context. Well, only for AO errors with usable addresses for now, at
least.
And we empty that ring in mce_process_work().
I think it would be a *lot* simpler if you modify the logic to put all
errors into the ring and remove the call chain call from mce_log(). I'm
looking at mce_report_event() which even does the irq_work stuff if
we need to raise an IPI *during* the MCE so that stuff gets processed
*before* we return to userspace.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 2:34 Some RAS bug fix patches Chen, Gong
2014-07-16 2:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] APEI, GHES: Cleanup unnecessary function for lock-less list Chen, Gong
2014-07-20 8:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-16 2:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context Chen, Gong
2014-07-21 8:47 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-07-21 17:14 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-21 21:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 22:03 ` Luck, Tony
2014-07-21 22:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE Tony Luck
2014-07-22 17:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 21:24 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-23 7:48 ` Chen, Gong
2014-07-16 2:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] RAS, HWPOISON: Fix wrong error recovery status Chen, Gong
2014-07-16 19:57 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2014-07-19 8:05 ` Some RAS bug fix patches Chen, Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140721084737.GA10016@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox