linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] mm: vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable() fix
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:40:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140716094034.GE7121@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405344049-19868-3-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

On Mon 14-07-14 09:20:48, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> As per Mel, use bool for reclaimability throughout and simplify the
> reclaimability tracking in shrink_zones().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Looks good to me and it fits better with my low/min limit patches which I
hopefully post soon.

> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 6dac1310e5e4..74a9e0ae09b0 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2244,10 +2244,10 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
> +static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
> -	unsigned long zone_reclaimed = 0;
> +	bool reclaimable = false;
>  
>  	do {
>  		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
> @@ -2291,12 +2291,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			   sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
>  			   sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
>  
> -		zone_reclaimed += sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed;
> +		if (sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed)
> +			reclaimable = true;
>  
>  	} while (should_continue_reclaim(zone, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed,
>  					 sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc));
>  
> -	return zone_reclaimed;
> +	return reclaimable;
>  }
>  
>  /* Returns true if compaction should go ahead for a high-order request */
> @@ -2346,7 +2347,7 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order)
>   * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
>   * scan then give up on it.
>   *
> - * Returns whether the zones overall are reclaimable or not.
> + * Returns true if a zone was reclaimable.
>   */
>  static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  {
> @@ -2361,7 +2362,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  		.gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask,
>  	};
>  	enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
> -	bool all_unreclaimable = true;
> +	bool reclaimable = false;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
> @@ -2376,8 +2377,6 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  
>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
>  					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
> -		unsigned long zone_reclaimed = 0;
> -
>  		if (!populated_zone(zone))
>  			continue;
>  		/*
> @@ -2424,15 +2423,17 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  						&nr_soft_scanned);
>  			sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
>  			sc->nr_scanned += nr_soft_scanned;
> -			zone_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
> +			if (nr_soft_reclaimed)
> +				reclaimable = true;
>  			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
>  		}
>  
> -		zone_reclaimed += shrink_zone(zone, sc);
> +		if (shrink_zone(zone, sc))
> +			reclaimable = true;
>  
> -		if (zone_reclaimed ||
> -		    (global_reclaim(sc) && zone_reclaimable(zone)))
> -			all_unreclaimable = false;
> +		if (global_reclaim(sc) &&
> +		    !reclaimable && zone_reclaimable(zone))
> +			reclaimable = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2455,7 +2456,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>  	 */
>  	sc->gfp_mask = orig_mask;
>  
> -	return !all_unreclaimable;
> +	return reclaimable;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.0.0
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-16  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-14 13:20 [patch 0/3] mm: vmscan: followup fixes to cleanups in -mm Johannes Weiner
2014-07-14 13:20 ` [patch 1/3] mm: vmscan: rework compaction-ready signaling in direct reclaim fix Johannes Weiner
2014-07-14 14:09   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-18 12:50   ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-14 13:20 ` [patch 2/3] mm: vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable() fix Johannes Weiner
2014-07-14 14:10   ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-16  9:40   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-07-18 12:51   ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-14 13:20 ` [patch 3/3] mm: vmscan: clean up struct scan_control Johannes Weiner
2014-07-14 19:46   ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-17 13:26     ` Johannes Weiner
2014-07-17 13:57       ` Michal Hocko
2014-07-17 23:00         ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-18 12:53       ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-14 19:56   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140716094034.GE7121@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox