From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Gioh Kim" <gioh.kim@lge.com>,
"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@mina86.com>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Joonsoo Kim" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>, 이건호 <gunho.lee@lge.com>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CMA page migration failure due to buffers on bh_lru
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:46:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140701224621.bb6a5157.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B216C5.8020503@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:02:45 -0700 Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 6/30/2014 6:07 PM, Gioh Kim wrote:
> > Hi,Laura.
> >
> > I have a question.
> >
> > Does the __evict_bh_lru() not need bh_lru_lock()?
> > The get_cpu_var() has already preenpt_disable() and can prevent other thread.
> > But get_cpu_var cannot prevent IRQ context such like page-fault.
> > I think if a page-fault occured and a file is read in IRQ context it can change cpu-lru.
> >
> > Is my concern correct?
> >
> >
>
> __evict_bh_lru is called via on_each_cpu_cond which I believe will disable irqs.
> I based the code on the existing invalidate_bh_lru which did not take the bh_lru_lock
> either. It's possible I missed something though.
I fear that running on_each_cpu() within try_to_free_buffers() is going
to be horridly expensive in some cases.
Maybe CMA can use invalidate_bh_lrus() to shoot down everything before
trying the allocation attempt. That should increase the success rate
greatly and doesn't burden page reclaim. The bh LRU isn't terribly
important from a performance point of view, so emptying it occasionally
won't hurt.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 1:12 Gioh Kim
2014-06-26 15:57 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-26 23:23 ` Gioh Kim
2014-06-29 19:49 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-01 1:07 ` Gioh Kim
2014-07-01 2:02 ` Laura Abbott
2014-07-02 5:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-07-03 7:34 ` Gioh Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140701224621.bb6a5157.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gioh.kim@lge.com \
--cc=gunho.lee@lge.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox