From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 01/10] mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:38:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140603123836.GF1321@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401380162-24121-2-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Thu 29-05-14 12:15:53, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> This function was split out because mem_cgroup_try_charge() got too
> big. But having essentially one sequence of operations arbitrarily
> split in half is not good for reworking the code. Fold it back in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4df733e13727..c3c10ab98355 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2552,80 +2552,6 @@ static int memcg_cpu_hotplug_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> -
> -/* See mem_cgroup_try_charge() for details */
> -enum {
> - CHARGE_OK, /* success */
> - CHARGE_RETRY, /* need to retry but retry is not bad */
> - CHARGE_NOMEM, /* we can't do more. return -ENOMEM */
> - CHARGE_WOULDBLOCK, /* GFP_WAIT wasn't set and no enough res. */
> -};
> -
> -static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - unsigned int nr_pages, unsigned int min_pages,
> - bool invoke_oom)
> -{
> - unsigned long csize = nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> - struct mem_cgroup *mem_over_limit;
> - struct res_counter *fail_res;
> - unsigned long flags = 0;
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = res_counter_charge(&memcg->res, csize, &fail_res);
> -
> - if (likely(!ret)) {
> - if (!do_swap_account)
> - return CHARGE_OK;
> - ret = res_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, csize, &fail_res);
> - if (likely(!ret))
> - return CHARGE_OK;
> -
> - res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->res, csize);
> - mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, memsw);
> - flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
> - } else
> - mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, res);
> - /*
> - * Never reclaim on behalf of optional batching, retry with a
> - * single page instead.
> - */
> - if (nr_pages > min_pages)
> - return CHARGE_RETRY;
> -
> - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
> - return CHARGE_WOULDBLOCK;
> -
> - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> - return CHARGE_NOMEM;
> -
> - ret = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
> - if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
> - return CHARGE_RETRY;
> - /*
> - * Even though the limit is exceeded at this point, reclaim
> - * may have been able to free some pages. Retry the charge
> - * before killing the task.
> - *
> - * Only for regular pages, though: huge pages are rather
> - * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back
> - * to regular pages anyway in case of failure.
> - */
> - if (nr_pages <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) && ret)
> - return CHARGE_RETRY;
> -
> - /*
> - * At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's
> - * better to wait until the end of task_move if something is going on.
> - */
> - if (mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(mem_over_limit))
> - return CHARGE_RETRY;
> -
> - if (invoke_oom)
> - mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(csize));
> -
> - return CHARGE_NOMEM;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * mem_cgroup_try_charge - try charging a memcg
> * @memcg: memcg to charge
> @@ -2642,7 +2568,11 @@ static int mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> {
> unsigned int batch = max(CHARGE_BATCH, nr_pages);
> int nr_oom_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> - int ret;
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem_over_limit;
> + struct res_counter *fail_res;
> + unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> + unsigned long long size;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> goto done;
> @@ -2662,44 +2592,76 @@ static int mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>
> if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> oom = false;
> -again:
> +retry:
> if (consume_stock(memcg, nr_pages))
> goto done;
>
> - do {
> - bool invoke_oom = oom && !nr_oom_retries;
> + size = batch * PAGE_SIZE;
> + if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->res, size, &fail_res)) {
> + if (!do_swap_account)
> + goto done_restock;
> + if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, size, &fail_res))
> + goto done_restock;
> + res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->res, size);
> + mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, memsw);
> + flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
> + } else
> + mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, res);
>
> - /* If killed, bypass charge */
> - if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> - goto bypass;
> + if (batch > nr_pages) {
> + batch = nr_pages;
> + goto retry;
> + }
>
> - ret = mem_cgroup_do_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, batch,
> - nr_pages, invoke_oom);
> - switch (ret) {
> - case CHARGE_OK:
> - break;
> - case CHARGE_RETRY: /* not in OOM situation but retry */
> - batch = nr_pages;
> - goto again;
> - case CHARGE_WOULDBLOCK: /* !__GFP_WAIT */
> - goto nomem;
> - case CHARGE_NOMEM: /* OOM routine works */
> - if (!oom || invoke_oom)
> - goto nomem;
> - nr_oom_retries--;
> - break;
> - }
> - } while (ret != CHARGE_OK);
> + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
> + goto nomem;
>
> - if (batch > nr_pages)
> - refill_stock(memcg, batch - nr_pages);
> -done:
> - return 0;
> + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> + goto nomem;
> +
> + nr_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
> +
> + if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= batch)
> + goto retry;
> + /*
> + * Even though the limit is exceeded at this point, reclaim
> + * may have been able to free some pages. Retry the charge
> + * before killing the task.
> + *
> + * Only for regular pages, though: huge pages are rather
> + * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back
> + * to regular pages anyway in case of failure.
> + */
> + if (nr_reclaimed && batch <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
> + goto retry;
> + /*
> + * At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's
> + * better to wait until the end of task_move if something is going on.
> + */
> + if (mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(mem_over_limit))
> + goto retry;
> +
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + goto bypass;
> +
> + if (!oom)
> + goto nomem;
> +
> + if (nr_oom_retries--)
> + goto retry;
> +
> + mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(batch));
> nomem:
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
> return -ENOMEM;
> bypass:
> return -EINTR;
> +
> +done_restock:
> + if (batch > nr_pages)
> + refill_stock(memcg, batch - nr_pages);
> +done:
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 1.9.3
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-03 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 16:15 [patch 0/9] mm: memcontrol: naturalize charge lifetime v2 Johannes Weiner
2014-05-29 16:15 ` [patch 01/10] mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge() Johannes Weiner
2014-06-03 12:38 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-05-29 16:15 ` [patch 02/10] mm: memcontrol: rearrange charging fast path Johannes Weiner
2014-06-03 12:54 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-29 16:15 ` [patch 03/10] mm: memcontrol: retry reclaim for oom-disabled and __GFP_NOFAIL charges Johannes Weiner
2014-06-03 13:20 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-29 16:15 ` [patch 04/10] mm: memcontrol: reclaim at least once for __GFP_NORETRY Johannes Weiner
2014-06-03 13:16 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-29 16:15 ` [patch 05/10] mm: memcontrol: catch root bypass in move precharge Johannes Weiner
2014-06-03 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-29 16:15 ` [patch 06/10] mm: memcontrol: use root_mem_cgroup res_counter Johannes Weiner
2014-06-03 14:11 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-29 16:15 ` [patch 07/10] mm: memcontrol: remove ordering between pc->mem_cgroup and PageCgroupUsed Johannes Weiner
2014-05-29 16:16 ` [patch 08/10] mm: memcontrol: do not acquire page_cgroup lock for kmem pages Johannes Weiner
2014-05-29 16:16 ` [patch 09/10] mm: memcontrol: rewrite charge API Johannes Weiner
2014-05-29 16:16 ` [patch 10/10] mm: memcontrol: rewrite uncharge API Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140603123836.GF1321@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox