From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] mm: memcontrol: rewrite uncharge API
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:59:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140527185930.GB2878@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53844220.5040507@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi Kame,
it's been a long time, I hope you're doing well.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2014/05/01 5:25), Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > The memcg uncharging code that is involved towards the end of a page's
> > lifetime - truncation, reclaim, swapout, migration - is impressively
> > complicated and fragile.
> >
> > Because anonymous and file pages were always charged before they had
> > their page->mapping established, uncharges had to happen when the page
> > type could be known from the context, as in unmap for anonymous, page
> > cache removal for file and shmem pages, and swap cache truncation for
> > swap pages. However, these operations also happen well before the
> > page is actually freed, and so a lot of synchronization is necessary:
> >
> > - On page migration, the old page might be unmapped but then reused,
> > so memcg code has to prevent an untimely uncharge in that case.
> > Because this code - which should be a simple charge transfer - is so
> > special-cased, it is not reusable for replace_page_cache().
> >
> > - Swap cache truncation happens during both swap-in and swap-out, and
> > possibly repeatedly before the page is actually freed. This means
> > that the memcg swapout code is called from many contexts that make
> > no sense and it has to figure out the direction from page state to
> > make sure memory and memory+swap are always correctly charged.
> >
> > But now that charged pages always have a page->mapping, introduce
> > mem_cgroup_uncharge(), which is called after the final put_page(),
> > when we know for sure that nobody is looking at the page anymore.
> >
> > For page migration, introduce mem_cgroup_migrate(), which is called
> > after the migration is successful and the new page is fully rmapped.
> > Because the old page is no longer uncharged after migration, prevent
> > double charges by decoupling the page's memcg association (PCG_USED
> > and pc->mem_cgroup) from the page holding an actual charge. The new
> > bits PCG_MEM and PCG_MEMSW represent the respective charges and are
> > transferred to the new page during migration.
> >
> > mem_cgroup_migrate() is suitable for replace_page_cache() as well.
> >
> > Swap accounting is massively simplified: because the page is no longer
> > uncharged as early as swap cache deletion, a new mem_cgroup_swapout()
> > can transfer the page's memory+swap charge (PCG_MEMSW) to the swap
> > entry before the final put_page() in page reclaim.
> >
> > Finally, because pages are now charged under proper serialization
> > (anon: exclusive; cache: page lock; swapin: page lock; migration: page
> > lock), and uncharged under full exclusion, they can not race with
> > themselves. Because they are also off-LRU during charge/uncharge,
> > charge migration can not race, with that, either. Remove the crazily
> > expensive the page_cgroup lock and set pc->flags non-atomically.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>
> The whole series seems wonderful to me. Thank you.
> I'm not sure whether I have enough good eyes now but this seems good.
Thank you!
> One thing in my mind is batched uncharge rework.
>
> Because uncharge() is done in final put_page() path,
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_start()/mem_cgroup_uncharge_end() placement may not be good enough.
>
> swap.c::release_pages() may be good to have mem_cgroup_uncharge_start()/end().
> (and you may be able to remove unnecessary calls of mem_cgroup_uncharge_start/end())
That's a good point.
I pushed the batch calls from all pagevec_release() callers directly
into release_pages(), which is everyone but shrink_page_list().
THP fallback abort used to do real uncharging, but now only does
cancelling, so it's no longer batched - I removed the batch calls
there as well. Not optimal, but it should be fine in this slowpath.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-27 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 20:25 [patch 0/9] mm: memcontrol: naturalize charge lifetime Johannes Weiner
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 1/9] mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge() Johannes Weiner
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 2/9] mm: memcontrol: rearrange charging fast path Johannes Weiner
2014-05-07 14:33 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-08 18:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-12 7:59 ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 3/9] mm: memcontrol: retry reclaim for oom-disabled and __GFP_NOFAIL charges Johannes Weiner
2014-05-07 14:43 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-08 18:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 4/9] mm: memcontrol: catch root bypass in move precharge Johannes Weiner
2014-05-07 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-08 18:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 5/9] mm: memcontrol: use root_mem_cgroup res_counter Johannes Weiner
2014-05-07 15:14 ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 6/9] mm: memcontrol: remove ordering between pc->mem_cgroup and PageCgroupUsed Johannes Weiner
2014-05-23 13:20 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-27 19:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-28 11:31 ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 7/9] mm: memcontrol: do not acquire page_cgroup lock for kmem pages Johannes Weiner
2014-05-23 13:39 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-23 13:40 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-23 14:29 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-05-27 19:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-28 11:33 ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 8/9] mm: memcontrol: rewrite charge API Johannes Weiner
2014-05-23 14:18 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-23 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-23 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-27 20:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-28 11:37 ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 20:25 ` [patch 9/9] mm: memcontrol: rewrite uncharge API Johannes Weiner
2014-05-04 14:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-27 7:43 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-05-27 18:59 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2014-05-02 11:26 ` [patch 0/9] mm: memcontrol: naturalize charge lifetime Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140527185930.GB2878@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox