From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ve0-f170.google.com (mail-ve0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD27F6B0036 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 10:06:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id db11so5260703veb.15 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 07:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com. [192.55.52.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id is5si2336020pbb.1.2014.05.09.07.06.12 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 07:06:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" In-Reply-To: References: <1399552888-11024-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20140508160205.A0EC7E009B@blue.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] remap_file_pages() decommission Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20140509140536.F06BFE009B@blue.fi.intel.com> Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 17:05:36 +0300 (EEST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Armin Rigo , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > > >> i.e. if you remove or > >> emulate remap_file_pages(), please increase the default limit as well. > > > > It's fine to me. Andrew? > > Not Andrew, but one thing we might look at is to make the limit > per-user rather than per-vm. Hm. I'm confused here. Do we have any limit forced per-user? I only see things like rlimits which are copied from parrent. Is it what you want? -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org